CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 624Motor Control and AdaptationNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesSport Psychology and Performance

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 37 of the 38 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Anatomy of Motor Learning. I. Frontal Cortex and Attention to Action

Jueptner, M., Stephan, K. M., Frith, C. D., Brooks, D. J., Frackowiak, R.S.J., Passingham, R. E.·1997·Journal of Neurophysiology
DOI 10.1152/jn.1997.77.3.1313
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

We used positron emission tomography to study new learning and automatic performance in normal volunteers. Subjects learned sequences of eight finger movements by trial and error. In a previous experiment we showed that the prefrontal cortex was activated during new learning but not during during automatic performance. The aim of the present experiment was to see what areas could be reactivated if the subjects performed the prelearned sequence but were required to pay attention to what they were doing. Scans were carried out under four conditions. In the first the subjects performed a prelearned sequence of eight key presses; this sequence was learned before scanning and was practiced until it had become overlearned, so that the subjects were able to perform it automatically. In the second condition the subjects learned a new sequence during scanning. In a third condition the subjects performed the prelearned sequence, but they were required to attend to what they were doing; they were instructed to think about the next movement. The fourth condition was a baseline condition. As in the earlier study, the dorsal prefrontal cortex and anterior cingulate area 32 were activated during new learning, but not during automatic performance. The left dorsal prefrontal cortex and the right anterior cingulate cortex were reactivated when subjects paid attention to the performance of the prelearned sequence compared with automatic performance of the same task. It is suggested that the critical feature was that the subjects were required to attend to the preparation of their responses. However, the dorsal prefrontal cortex and the anterior cingulate cortex were activated more when the subjects learned a new sequence than they were when subjects simply paid attention to a prelearned sequence. New learning differs from the attention condition in that the subjects generated moves, monitored the outcomes, and remembered the responses that had been successful. All these are nonroutine operations to which the subjects must attend. Further analysis is needed to specify which are the nonroutine operations that require the involvement of the dorsal prefrontal and anterior cingulate cortex.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1152/jn.1997.77.3.1313

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 38 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Vogt B. A., 1992, Cereb. Cortex, 2, 435

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 624

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Jueptner, M., Stephan, K. M., Frith, C. D., Brooks, D. J., Frackowiak, R. S. J., & Passingham, R. E.
Affiliations
Hammersmith Hospital (GB)
ORCID
Venue
Journal of Neurophysiology
Publisher
American Physiological Society
Published
1997-03-01
Volume
77
Issue
3
Pages
1313-1324
ISSN
  • 0022-3077 (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-1598
DOI
10.1152/jn.1997.77.3.1313
OpenAlex
W2219528871
Cited by
624
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 29 · 2012: 20
FWCI
19.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Neurophysiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Wellcome Trust
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Sport Psychology and Performance
Keywords
motor learning, prefrontal cortex, dorsal prefrontal cortex, anterior cingulate cortex, overlearning, response preparation, trial-and-error learning, brain activation
MeSH terms
Adult, Attention, Cerebrovascular Circulation, Fingers, Humans, Learning, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Psychomotor Performance, Tomography, Emission-Computed, Prefrontal Cortex

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review