The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Chemical Stimulation of the Intracranial Dura Induces Enhanced Responses to Facial Stimulation in Brain Stem Trigeminal Neurons
Abstract
Burstein, Rami, Hiroyoshi Yamamura, Amy Malick, and Andrew M. Strassman. Chemical stimulation of the intracranial dura induces enhanced responses to facial stimulation in brain stem trigeminal neurons. J. Neurophysiol. 79: 964–982, 1998. Chemical activation and sensitization of trigeminal primary afferent neurons innervating the intracranial meninges have been postulated as possible causes of certain headaches. This sensitization, however, cannot explain the extracranial hypersensitivity that often accompanies headache. The goal of this study was to test the hypothesis that chemical activation and sensitization of meningeal sensory neurons can lead to activation and sensitization of central trigeminal neurons that receive convergent input from the dura and skin. This hypothesis was investigated by recording changes in the responsiveness of 23 [16 wide-dynamic range (WDR), 5 high threshold (HT), and 2 low threshold (LT)] dura-sensitive neurons in nucleus caudalis to mechanical stimulation of their dural receptive fields and to mechanical and thermal stimulation of their cutaneous receptive fields after local application of inflammatory mediators or acidic agents to the dura. Responses to brief chemical stimulation were recorded in 70% of the neurons; most were short, lasting the duration of the stimulus only. Twenty minutes after chemical stimulation of the dura, the following changes occurred: 1) 95% of the neurons showed significant increases in sensitivity to mechanical indentation of the dura: their thresholds to dural indentation changed from 1.57 to 0.49 g (means, P < 0.0001), and the response magnitude to identical stimuli increased by two- to fourfold; 2) 80% of the neurons showed significant increases in cutaneous mechanosensitivity: their responses to brush and pressure increased 2.5- ( P < 0.05) and 1.6-fold ( P < 0.05), respectively; 3) 75% of the neurons showed a significant increase in cutaneous thermosensitivity: their thresholds to slow heating of the skin changed from 43.7 ± 0.7 to 40.3 ± 0.7°C ( P < 0.005) and to slow cooling from 23.7 ± 3.3 to 29.2 ± 1.8°C ( P < 0.05); 4) dural receptive fields expanded within 30 min and cutaneous receptive fields within 2–4 h; and 5) ongoing activity developed in WDR and HT but not in LT neurons. Application of lidocaine to the dura abolished the response to dural stimulation but had minimal effect on the increased responses to cutaneous stimulation (suggesting involvement of a central mechanism in maintaining the sensitized state). Antidromic activation (current of <30 μA) of dura-sensitive neurons revealed projections to the hypothalamus, thalamus, and midbrain. These findings suggest that chemical activation and sensitization of dura-sensitive peripheral nociceptors could lead to enhanced responses in central neurons and that this central sensitization therefore could result in extracranial tenderness (mechanical and thermal allodynia) in the absence of extracranial pathology. The projection targets of these neurons suggest a possible role in mediating the autonomic, endocrine, and affective symptoms that accompany headaches.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Nerve fibres and their terminals of the dura mater encephali of the rat
Andres, K. H., D�ring, M., Muszynski, K., & Schmidt, R. F. (1987) · Anatomy and Embryology · doi:10.1007/bf00309843 · Cited by 289
Cited by
Central sensitization: a generator of pain hypersensitivity by central neural plasticity
Latremoliere, A., & Woolf, C. J. (2009) · The Journal of Pain · doi:10.1016/j.jpain.2009.06.012 · Cited by 3,913
Pathophysiology of migraine: a disorder of sensory processing
Goadsby, P. J., Holland, P. R., Martins-Oliveira, M., Hoffmann, J., Schankin, C., & Akerman, S. (2017) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00034.2015 · Cited by 1,998
A neural mechanism for exacerbation of headache by light
Noseda, R., Kainz, V., Jakubowski, M., Gooley, J. J., Saper, C. B., Digre, K., & Burstein, R. (2010) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.2475 · Cited by 565
Self-citationDiencephalic and brainstem mechanisms in migraine
Akerman, S., Holland, P. R., & Goadsby, P. J. (2011) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn3057 · Cited by 532
PACAP38 induces migraine-like attacks in patients with migraine without aura
Schytz, H. W., Birk, S., Wienecke, T., Kruuse, C., Olesen, J., & Ashina, M. (2009) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awn307 · Cited by 494
Metadata
- Authors
- Burstein, R., Yamamura, H., Malick, A., & Strassman, A. M.
- Venue
- Journal of Neurophysiology
- Publisher
- American Physiological Society
- Published
- 1998-02-01
- Volume
- 79
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 964-982
- ISSN
- 0022-3077 (ISSN-L)
- 1522-1598
- OpenAlex
- W1957395289
- Cited by
- 606
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 8.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Chemical Stimulation of the Intracranial Dura Induces Enhanced Responses to Facial Stimulation in Brain Stem Trigeminal Neurons. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1152/jn.1998.79.2.964
- The paper
- Burstein, R., Yamamura, H., Malick, A., & Strassman, A. M. (1998). Chemical Stimulation of the Intracranial Dura Induces Enhanced Responses to Facial Stimulation in Brain Stem Trigeminal Neurons. Journal of Neurophysiology. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.1998.79.2.964
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.