Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 233

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The in vivo gene expression signature of oxidative stress

Open access
Han, Eun-Soo, Muller, Florian L., Pérez, Viviana I., Qi, Wenbo, Liang, Huiyun, Xi, Liang, Fu, Chunxiao, Doyle, Erin, Hickey, Morgen, Cornell, John, Epstein, Charles J., Roberts, L. Jackson, Van Remmen, Holly, Richardson, Arlan·2008·Physiological Genomics

Abstract

How higher organisms respond to elevated oxidative stress in vivo is poorly understood. Therefore, we measured oxidative stress parameters and gene expression alterations (Affymetrix arrays) in the liver caused by elevated reactive oxygen species induced in vivo by diquat or by genetic ablation of the major antioxidant enzymes CuZn-superoxide dismutase ( Sod1) and glutathione peroxidase-1 ( Gpx1). Diquat (50 mg/kg) treatment resulted in a significant increase in oxidative damage within 3–6 h in wild-type mice without any lethality. In contrast, treatment of Sod1−/−or Gpx1−/−mice with a similar concentration of diquat resulted in a significant increase in oxidative damage within an hour of treatment and was lethal, i.e., these mice are extremely sensitive to the oxidative stress generated by diquat. The expression response to elevated oxidative stress in vivo does not involve an upregulation of classic antioxidant genes, although long-term oxidative stress in Sod1−/−mice leads to a significant upregulation of thiol antioxidants (e.g., Mt1, Srxn1, Gclc, Txnrd1), which appears to be mediated by the redox-sensitive transcription factor Nrf2. The main finding of our study is that the common response to elevated oxidative stress with diquat treatment in wild-type, Gpx1−/−, and Sod1−/−mice and in untreated Sod1−/−mice is an upregulation of p53 target genes ( p21, Gdf15, Plk3, Atf3, Trp53inp1, Ddit4, Gadd45a, Btg2, Ndrg1). A retrospective comparison with previous studies shows that induction of these p53 target genes is a conserved expression response to oxidative stress, in vivo and in vitro, in different species and different cells/organs.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1152/physiolgenomics.00239.2007

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 14 references

Cited by

See all 233

Metadata

Authors
Han, E.-S., Muller, F. L., Pérez, V. I., Qi, W., Liang, H., Xi, L., Fu, C., Doyle, E., Hickey, M., Cornell, J., Epstein, C. J., Roberts, L. J., Van Remmen, H., & Richardson, A.
Venue
Physiological Genomics
Published
2008-06
Volume
34
Issue
1
Pages
112-126
ISSN
  • 1094-8341 (ISSN-L)
  • 1531-2267
OpenAlex
W2128898891
Cited by
233
References
14
FWCI
7.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The in vivo gene expression signature of oxidative stress. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1152/physiolgenomics.00239.2007
The paper
Han, E.-S., Muller, F. L., Pérez, V. I., Qi, W., Liang, H., Xi, L., Fu, C., Doyle, E., Hickey, M., Cornell, J., Epstein, C. J., Roberts, L. J., Van Remmen, H., & Richardson, A. (2008). The in vivo gene expression signature of oxidative stress. Physiological Genomics. https://doi.org/10.1152/physiolgenomics.00239.2007

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.