Cited by 20Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesNeural dynamics and brain functionCognitive Functions and Memory

Strategic cognitive sequencing: a computational cognitive neuroscience approach

Open access
Herd, Seth A., Krueger, Kai A., Kriete, Trenton E., Huang, Tsung-Ren, Hazy, Thomas E., O'Reilly, Randall C.·2013·Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience

Abstract

We address strategic cognitive sequencing, the "outer loop" of human cognition: how the brain decides what cognitive process to apply at a given moment to solve complex, multistep cognitive tasks. We argue that this topic has been neglected relative to its importance for systematic reasons but that recent work on how individual brain systems accomplish their computations has set the stage for productively addressing how brain regions coordinate over time to accomplish our most impressive thinking. We present four preliminary neural network models. The first addresses how the prefrontal cortex (PFC) and basal ganglia (BG) cooperate to perform trial-and-error learning of short sequences; the next, how several areas of PFC learn to make predictions of likely reward, and how this contributes to the BG making decisions at the level of strategies. The third models address how PFC, BG, parietal cortex, and hippocampus can work together to memorize sequences of cognitive actions from instruction (or "self-instruction"). The last shows how a constraint satisfaction process can find useful plans. The PFC maintains current and goal states and associates from both of these to find a "bridging" state, an abstract plan. We discuss how these processes could work together to produce strategic cognitive sequencing and discuss future directions in this area.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1155/2013/149329

Cites

80 of 80 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The complementary learning systems hypothesis: the hippocampus plays a key role in processes where learning must occur quickly on the basis of single episodes, whereas the cortex learns more slowly by aggregating and integrating patterns across large amounts of data.

    “An influential idea—known as the “complementary learning systems hypothesis”—is that the hippocampus plays a key role in certain processes where learning must occur quickly on the basis of single episodes, whereas the cortex learns more slowly by aggregating and integrating patterns across large amounts of data (Herd et al., 2013; Leibo et al., 2015a; Blundell et al., 2016; Kumaran et al., 2016).”

    From Toward an integration of deep learning and neuroscience (2016) · cites this paper as Herd et al., 2013

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. [15]O'Reilly RC Munakata Y Computational Explorations in Cognitive Neuroscience: Understanding the Mind By Simulating the Brain 2000 Cambridge, Mass, USA The MIT Press
  2. [17]Newell A Simon HA Human Problem Solving 1972 Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA Prentice Hall
  3. [26]Anderson JR How Can the Human Mind Occur in the Physical Universe? 2007 New York, NY, USA Oxford University Press
  4. [45]Sutton RS Barto AG Reinforcement Learning: An Introduction 1998 Cambridge, Mass, USA MIT Press
  5. [65]Noelle DC Cottrell GW Moore JD Lehman JF A connectionist model of instruction following, pages Proceedings of the 17th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society January 1995 Mahwah, NJ, USA Lawrence Erlbaum Associates 369 374

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Herd, S. A., Krueger, K. A., Kriete, T. E., Huang, T.-R., Hazy, T. E., & O'Reilly, R. C.
Affiliations
  • University of Colorado Boulder (US)
  • Department of Psychology, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO 80309, USA
Corresponding author
Herd, Seth A.
Venue
Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013
Volume
2013
Pages
1-18
ISSN
  • 1687-5265 (ISSN-L)
  • 1687-5273
OpenAlex
W2028574200
Cited by
20
References
80
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 1
FWCI
1.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Office of Naval Research (N00014-10-1-0177, MH079485, D10PC20021)
  • National Institutes of Health (N00014-10-1-0177, MH079485, D10PC20021)
  • Intelligence Advanced Research Projects Activity (N00014-10-1-0177, MH079485, D10PC20021)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
Keywords
prefrontal cortex, basal ganglia, trial-and-error learning, sequence learning, reward prediction, decision-making, self-education, hippocampus, parietal cortex, constraint satisfaction, planning, neural network model
MeSH terms
Brain, Cognition, Humans, Models, Neurological, Neurosciences, Neural Networks, Computer

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review