Cited by 9Spinal Cord Injury ResearchMuscle activation and electromyography studiesBotulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders

Assessment of Hyperactive Reflexes in Patients with Spinal Cord Injury

Open access
Xu, Dali, Guo, Xin, Yang, Chung-Yong, Zhang, Li-Qun·2015·BioMed Research International

Abstract

Hyperactive reflexes are commonly observed in patients with spinal cord injury (SCI) but there is a lack of convenient and quantitative characterizations. Patellar tendon reflexes were examined in nine SCI patients and ten healthy control subjects by tapping the tendon using a hand-held instrumented hammer at various knee flexion angles, and the tapping force, quadriceps EMG, and knee extension torque were measured to characterize patellar tendon reflexes quantitatively in terms of the tendon reflex gain (Gtr), contraction rate (Rc), and reflex loop time delay (td). It was found that there are significant increases inGtrandRcand decrease intdin patients with spinal cord injury as compared to the controls (P<0.05). This study presented a convenient and quantitative method to evaluate reflex excitability and muscle contraction dynamics. With proper simplifications, it can potentially be used for quantitative diagnosis and outcome evaluations of hyperreflexia in clinical settings.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1155/2015/149875

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [2]Lance J. Symposium synopsis. Spasticity: disordered motor control, pp. 485–500, 1980

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Xu, D., Guo, X., Yang, C.-Y., & Zhang, L.-Q.
Affiliations
  • Shirley Ryan AbilityLab (US)
  • Northwestern University (US)
Corresponding author
Zhang, Li-Qun
Venue
BioMed Research International
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015
Volume
2015
Pages
1-8
ISSN
  • 1110-7243 (ISSN-L)
  • 2314-6133
  • 2314-6141
OpenAlex
W2050692694
Cited by
8
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1
FWCI
0.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BioMed Research International (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Daegu Gyeongbuk Institute of Science & Technology
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Spinal Cord Injury Research
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Muscle activation and electromyography studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders
Keywords
spinal cord injury, hyperreflexia, patellar reflex, reflex gain, knee flexion angle, knee extension torque, muscle contraction dynamics
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Humans, Male, Muscle Contraction, Reflex, Stretch, Spinal Cord Injuries, Time Factors, Case-Control Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review