Cited by 261Medical Image Segmentation TechniquesBrain Tumor Detection and ClassificationAdvanced MRI Techniques and Applications

MRBrainS Challenge: Online Evaluation Framework for Brain Image Segmentation in 3T MRI Scans

Open access
Mendrik, Adriënne M., Vincken, Koen L., Kuijf, Hugo J., Breeuwer, Marcel, Bouvy, Willem H., de Bresser, Jeroen, Alansary, Amir, de Bruijne, Marleen +22 more·2015·Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience

Abstract

Many methods have been proposed for tissue segmentation in brain MRI scans. The multitude of methods proposed complicates the choice of one method above others. We have therefore established the MRBrainS online evaluation framework for evaluating (semi)automatic algorithms that segment gray matter (GM), white matter (WM), and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) on 3T brain MRI scans of elderly subjects (65–80 y). Participants apply their algorithms to the provided data, after which their results are evaluated and ranked. Full manual segmentations of GM, WM, and CSF are available for all scans and used as the reference standard. Five datasets are provided for training and fifteen for testing. The evaluated methods are ranked based on their overall performance to segment GM, WM, and CSF and evaluated using three evaluation metrics (Dice, H95, and AVD) and the results are published on the MRBrainS13 website. We present the results of eleven segmentation algorithms that participated in the MRBrainS13 challenge workshop at MICCAI, where the framework was launched, and three commonly used freeware packages: FreeSurfer, FSL, and SPM. The MRBrainS evaluation framework provides an objective and direct comparison of all evaluated algorithms and can aid in selecting the best performing method for the segmentation goal at hand.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1155/2015/813696

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. [33]Alansary A. Soliman A. Khalifa F. MAP-based framework for segmentation of MR brain images based on visual appearance and prior shape Proceedings of the MICCAI Grand Challenge on MR Brain Image Segmentation (MRBrainS '13) September 2013 The Midas Journal
  2. [34]Jog A. Roy S. Prince J. L. Carass A. MR brain segmentation using decision trees Proceedings of the MICCAI Grand Challenge on MR Brain Image Segmentation (MRBrainS '13) September 2013 Nagoya, Japan The Midas Journal
  3. [35]Katyal R. Paneri S. Kuse M. Gaussian intensity model with neighborhood cues for fluid-tissue categorization of multi-sequence MR brain images Proceedings of the MICCAI Grand Challenge on MR Brain Image Segmentation (MRBrainS '13) September 2013 Nagoya, Japan The Midas Journal
  4. [37]van Opbroek A. van der Lijn F. de Bruijne M. Automated brain-tissue segmentation by multi-feature SVM classification Proceedings of the MICCAI Workshops—The MICCAI Grand Challenge on MR Brain Image Segmentation (MRBrainS '13) September 2013 The Midas Journal
  5. [38]Pereira S. Festa J. Mariz J. A. Sousa N. Silva C. A. Automatic brain tissue segmentation of multi-sequence MR images using random decision forests Proceedings of the MICCAI Grand Challenge on MR Brain Image Segmentation (MRBrainS '13) September 2013 Nagoya, Japan The Midas Journal
  6. [39]Rajchl M. Baxter J. Yuan J. Peters T. Khan A. Multi-atlas-based segmentation with hierarchical max-flow Proceedings of the MICCAI Grand Challenge on MR Brain Image Segmentation (MRBrainS '13) September 2013 Nagoya, Japan The Midas Journal
  7. [40]Sarikaya D. Zhao L. Corso J. J. Multi-atlas brain MRI segmentation with multiway cut Proceedings of the MICCAI Workshops—The MICCAI Grand Challenge on MR Brain Image Segmentation (MRBrainS '13) September 2013 The Midas Journal
  8. [41]Vrooman H. van der Lijn F. Niessen W. Auto-kNN: brain tissue segmentation using automatically trained k-nearest-neighbor classification Proceedings of the MICCAI Workshops—The MICCAI Grand Challenge on MR Brain Image Segmentation (MRBrainS '13) September 2013 The Midas Journal
  9. [42]Vyas S. Burlina P. Kleissas D. Mukherjee R. Automated walks using machine learning for segmentation Proceedings of the MICCAI Grand Challenge on MR Brain Image Segmentation (MRBrainS '13) September 2013 Nagoya, Japan The Midas Journal

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mendrik, A. M., Vincken, K. L., Kuijf, H. J., Breeuwer, M., Bouvy, W. H., de Bresser, J., Alansary, A., de Bruijne, M., Carass, A., El-Baz, A., Jog, A., Katyal, R., Khan, A. R., van der Lijn, F., Mahmood, Q., Mukherjee, R., van Opbroek, A., Paneri, S., Pereira, S., Persson, M., Rajchl, M., Sarikaya, D., Smedby, Ö., Silva, C. A., Vrooman, H. A., Vyas, S., Wang, C., Zhao, L., Biessels, G. J., & Viergever, M. A.
Affiliations
  • University Medical Center Utrecht (NL)
  • Philips (Netherlands) (NL)
  • Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, 3584 CX Utrecht, Netherlands
  • University of Louisville (US)
  • Biomedical Imaging Group Rotterdam, Departments of Medical Informatics and Radiology, Erasmus MC, 3015 CN Rotterdam, Netherlands
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • LNM Institute of Information Technology (IN)
  • Western University (CA)
  • Chalmers University of Technology (SE)
  • University of Minho (PT)
  • Robarts Research Institute (CA)
  • Computer Science and Engineering Department, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY 14260-2500, USA
  • Linköping University (SE)
  • Erasmus MC (NL)
  • University at Buffalo, State University of New York (US)
Corresponding author
Mendrik, Adriënne M.
Venue
Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015
Volume
2015
Pages
1-16
ISSN
  • 1687-5265 (ISSN-L)
  • 1687-5273
OpenAlex
W1794121648
Cited by
261
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 35 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 39 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1
FWCI
16.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Chalmers Research (Chalmers University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • TU/e Research Portal (submittedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion)
  • RePub (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • TU/e Research Portal (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • RePub (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion)
  • Spiral (Imperial College London) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • ZonMw (104002002, 2010T073)
  • Netherlands Heart Foundation (104002002, 2010T073)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Medical Image Segmentation Techniques
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Brain Tumor Detection and Classification
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
Keywords
brain MRI segmentation, tissue segmentation, gray matter segmentation, white matter segmentation, cerebrospinal fluid segmentation, 3T MRI, elderly brain, FreeSurfer, FSL, SPM, algorithm comparison
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Algorithms, Brain, Cerebrospinal Fluid, Female, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Online Systems, Reference Standards, Software, Reproducibility of Results, Databases, Factual, White Matter, Gray Matter

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review