Cited by 88Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationPain Management and TreatmentChronic Disease Management Strategies

Systematic review of multidisciplinary chronic pain treatment facilities

Open access
Fashler, Samantha R., Cooper, Lynn K., Oosenbrug, Eric D., Burns, Lindsay C., Razavi, Shima, Goldberg, Lauren, Katz, Joel·2016·Pain Research and Management

Abstract

This study reviewed the published literature evaluating multidisciplinary chronic pain treatment facilities to provide an overview of their availability, caseload, wait times, and facility characteristics. A systematic literature review was conducted using PRISMA guidelines following a search of MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and CINAHL databases. Inclusion criteria stipulated that studies be original research, survey more than one pain treatment facility directly, and describe a range of available treatments. Fourteen articles satisfied inclusion criteria. Results showed little consistency in the research design used to describe pain treatment facilities. Availability of pain treatment facilities was scarce and the reported caseloads and wait times were generally high. A wide range of medical, physical, and psychological pain treatments were available. Most studies reported findings on the percentage of practitioners in different health care professions employed. Future studies should consider using more comprehensive search strategies to survey facilities, improving clarity on what is considered to be a pain treatment facility, and reporting on a consistent set of variables to provide a clear summary of the status of pain treatment facilities. This review highlights important information for policymakers on the scope, demand, and accessibility of pain treatment facilities.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1155/2016/5960987

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fashler, S. R., Cooper, L. K., Oosenbrug, E. D., Burns, L. C., Razavi, S., Goldberg, L., & Katz, J.
Affiliations
  • York University (CA)
  • Canadian Pain Coalition, Oshawa, ON, Canada L1J 8P7
Corresponding author
  • Cooper, Lynn K.
  • Katz, Joel
Venue
Pain Research and Management
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016
Volume
2016
Pages
1-19
ISSN
  • 1203-6765 (ISSN-L)
  • 1918-1523
OpenAlex
W2334532697
Cited by
88
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 7 · 2015: 1
FWCI
0.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Pain Research and Management (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • York University Digital Library (York University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Canadian Institutes of Health Research
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Chronic Disease Management Strategies
Keywords
multidisciplinary pain clinic, chronic pain management, waiting time, caseloads, facility characteristics, health care access, pain management services
MeSH terms
Humans, Pain Measurement, Databases, Factual, Guidelines as Topic, Pain Clinics, Chronic Pain

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review