CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 12Stress and Burnout ResearchJob Satisfaction and Organizational BehaviorOccupational Health and Burnout

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 52 of the 52 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Exploring the Impact of Stress on Burnout: A Mathematical Model and Empirical Research

Open access
Jin, Cheng-Lin, Chen, Ting, Wu, Shu-Yang, Yang, Yi-Lin·2020·Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society
DOI 10.1155/2020/3475324
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Educational management and social psychology researchers have frequently suggested that job burnout and even turnover intention of college teachers can be induced by stress, which is an inherent part of fast-changing environments and advanced educational technology. However, studies about the contingency effect remain limited. We articulate the effect of role stress and technostress by integrating organizational behaviour and educational management literature. Particularly, this study tries to investigate the moderating effect of teacher agility and leader-member exchange differentiation on suppressing burnout. According to the job demands-resources model, we proposed that the negative effect of stress on burnout depends on the degree of agility and leader-member change quality (LMXD). A study of 271 samples supports the propositions. Specifically, the adverse effect of role stress on job burnout is strengthened by both employee agility and LMXD. We further elaborate theoretical implications on educational management, social psychology, and job demands-resources model.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1155/2020/3475324

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Leader-member exchange quality has a negative impact on burnout.

    “Leader-member exchange quality has a negative impact on burnout.The interaction between leader-member exchange quality and security-related technostress on burnout was not significant”

    From Leadership and technostress: A systematic literature review (2025) · cites this paper as Jin et al. (2020)

    Table 3 (indexed under §5.3, page unavailable) reports a significant negative coefficient for leader-member exchange quality differentiation (LMXD) in models predicting teacher burnout. But §3.2.3 defines LMXD as differences in exchange quality among staff, not leader-member exchange quality itself. The claim therefore omits a distinction that changes what was measured. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

  • The interaction between leader-member exchange quality and security-related technostress on burnout is not significant.

    “Leader-member exchange quality has a negative impact on burnout.The interaction between leader-member exchange quality and security-related technostress on burnout was not significant”

    From Leadership and technostress: A systematic literature review (2025) · cites this paper as Jin et al. (2020)

    Hypothesis Testing (section 4.3) reports a nonsignificant interaction between security-related technostress and LMXD on teacher burnout. But section 2.3 defines LMXD as differentiation in leader–member exchange quality across staff, not leader–member exchange quality itself. The claim omits that consequential distinction. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Metadata

Authors
Jin, C.-L., Chen, T., Wu, S.-Y., & Yang, Y.-L.
Affiliations
  • School of Management, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230088, China
  • Anhui Xinhua University (CN)
  • School of Humanities, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China
  • University of Science and Technology of China (CN)
Corresponding author
Chen, Ting
ORCID
Venue
Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2020-10-16
Volume
2020
Pages
1-8
ISSN
  • 1026-0226 (ISSN-L)
  • 1607-887X
DOI
10.1155/2020/3475324
OpenAlex
W3093033998
Cited by
12
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3
FWCI
1.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Greater South Information System
Funders
Anhui Department of Education (SK2019A0730, SK2019A0749, gxyqZD2016383)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Stress and Burnout Research
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Occupational Health and Burnout
Keywords
burnout, role stress, technostress, leader-member exchange, job demands-resources model, college teachers, turnover intention, moderating effect, educational management

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review