Cited by 13Gastrointestinal motility and disordersGut microbiota and healthProbiotics and Fermented Foods

Correlation between Intestinal Microflora in Irritable Bowel Syndrome and Severity

Open access
Ji, Min, Huang, Hua, Lan, Xianming·2022·Disease Markers

Abstract

Background. Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a common chronic functional gastrointestinal disease accompanied by changes in intestinal microecology. This study investigated the relationship between gut microbiota and disease severity in patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). Methods. An observational study was performed on 60 IBS patients (study group) and 20 healthy controls admitted to our hospital from January 2013 to December 2014. Fecal samples were taken after admission to measure intestinal flora including Bifidobacterium, Lactobacillus, Enterobacter, and Enterococcus, and patient blood was collected to determine serum D-lactate and diamine oxidase (DAO) levels. The gut microbiota and serum markers of the two groups were analyzed. The correlation of gut microbiota index levels and serum markers with disease severity, as well as the correlation between gut microbiota index levels and serum markers, were analyzed. Results. The levels of intestinal Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium were lower, while the levels of Enterococcus and Enterobacter and serum D-lactate were higher in the study group than those in the control group. The levels of intestinal Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium were lower, while the levels of Enterococcus and Enterobacter, serum D-lactate, and DAO were higher in patients with moderate IBS than those in patients with mild IBS. The levels of intestinal Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium were lower in patients with severe IBS than those with moderate IBS, while the levels of Enterococcus and Enterobacter, serum D-lactate, and DAO were higher in patients with severe IBS. There was a significant negative correlation between the levels of Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium and disease severity and a significant positive correlation between the levels of Enterococcus and Enterobacter, D-lactate, and DAO and disease severity. There was a significant negative correlation between the levels of Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium and serum D-lactate and DAO, while there was a significant positive correlation between the levels of Enterococcus and Enterobacter and serum D-lactate and DAO ( P < 0.05 ). Conclusion. Intestinal flora, D-lactate, and DAO were abnormal in IBS patients, and intestinal flora was closely correlated with disease severity, D-lactate, and DAO levels.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1155/2022/1031844This paper is marked retracted.

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Some studies reported that the number of Bifidobacteria and Lactobacilli in the feces of IBS patients was less than that of normal subjects, whereas other studies reported that the number was greater.

    “Some studies have reported that the number of Bifidobacteria and Lactobacilli in the feces of IBS patients was less than that of normal subjects, whereas other studies reported that the number was greater than that of normal subjects [8,9,10,11,12,13,14].”

    From Effectiveness and Safety of Probiotics for Patients with Constipation-Predominant Irritable Bowel Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 10 Randomized Controlled Trials (2022) · cites this paper as [11]

    The Results (§3.1) report lower fecal Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium levels in IBS patients than in healthy controls, supporting the first half of the claim. The cited passages do not report studies finding higher levels of these bacteria in IBS patients, so this source does not support the contrasting half. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ji, M., Huang, H., & Lan, X.
Affiliations
Shenzhen Second People's Hospital (CN)
Corresponding author
Ji, Min
Venue
Disease Markers
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2022-05-18
Volume
2022
Pages
1-6
ISSN
  • 0278-0240 (ISSN-L)
  • 1875-8630
OpenAlex
W4280640907
Cited by
13
References
25
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 2
FWCI
2.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Status
Retracted
Open access
Locations
  • Disease Markers (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Shenzhen Science and Technology Innovation Commission (JCYJ20140415112419066)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
Keywords
irritable bowel syndrome, gut microbiota, disease severity, Bifidobacterium, Lactobacillus, Enterobacter, Enterococcus, D-lactate, diamine oxidase, serum biomarkers, dysbiosis
MeSH terms
Gastrointestinal Microbiome, Bifidobacterium, Humans, Lactobacillus, Biomarkers, Lactic Acid, Irritable Bowel Syndrome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review