Cited by 202Ferroptosis and cancer prognosisBreast Cancer Treatment StudiesIron Metabolism and Disorders

An iron regulatory gene signature predicts outcome in breast cancer

Open access
Miller, Lance D., Coffman, Lan G., Chou, Jeff W., Black, Michael A., Bergh, Jonas, D'Agostino, Ralph, Torti, Suzy V., Torti, Frank M.·2011·Cancer Research

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Changes in iron regulation characterize the malignant state. However, the pathways that effect these changes and their specific impact on prognosis remain poorly understood. We capitalized on publicly available microarray datasets comprising 674 breast cancer cases to systematically investigate how expression of genes related to iron metabolism is linked to breast cancer prognosis. Of 61 genes involved in iron regulation, 49% were statistically significantly associated with distant metastasis-free survival. Cases were divided into test and training cohorts, and the supervised principal component method was used to stratify cases into risk groups. Optimal risk stratification was achieved with a model comprising 16 genes, which we term the iron regulatory gene signature (IRGS). Multivariable analysis revealed that the IRGS contributes information not captured by conventional prognostic indicators (HR = 1.61; 95% confidence interval: 1.16-2.24; P = 0.004). The IRGS successfully stratified homogeneously treated patients, including ER+ patients treated with tamoxifen monotherapy, both with (P = 0.006) and without (P = 0.03) lymph node metastases. To test whether multiple pathways were embedded within the IRGS, we evaluated the performance of two gene dyads with known roles in iron biology in ER+ patients treated with tamoxifen monotherapy (n = 371). For both dyads, gene combinations that minimized intracellular iron content [anti-import: TFRC(Low)/HFE(High); or pro-export: SLC40A1 (ferroportin)(High)/HAMP(Low)] were associated with favorable prognosis (P < 0.005). Although the clinical utility of the IRGS will require further evaluation, its ability to both identify high-risk patients within traditionally low-risk groups and low-risk patients within high-risk groups has the potential to affect therapeutic decision making.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1158/0008-5472.can-11-1870

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A significant association between almost 50% of genes involved in iron metabolism and breast cancer prognosis has been observed.

    “Intriguingly, a significant association between almost 50% of genes involved in iron metabolism and breast cancer prognosis has been observed (Miller et al., 2011).”

    From The Role of Iron Regulation in Immunometabolism and Immune-Related Disease (2019) · cites this paper as Miller et al., 2011

  • Large amounts of hepcidin are found both within the tumor microenvironment and systemically in cancer patients.

    “Interestingly, large amounts of hepcidin are found both within the tumor microenvironment and systemically in cancer patients [73,74,75,76].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 38 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [32]Lundgren K Holm C Landberg G Hypoxia and breast cancer: prognostic and therapeutic implications Cell Mol Life Sci 2007 64 24 3233 47 17957335 PMC11136324

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Miller, L. D., Coffman, L. G., Chou, J. W., Black, M. A., Bergh, J., D'Agostino, R., Torti, S. V., & Torti, F. M.
Affiliations
Karolinska Institutet (SE)
Corresponding author
Torti, Frank M.
Venue
Cancer Research
Published
2011-10-30
Volume
71
Issue
21
Pages
6728-6737
ISSN
  • 0008-5472 (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-7445
OpenAlex
W2101427112
Cited by
202
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 11
FWCI
11.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cancer Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Cancer Institute (P30CA012197)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (R01DK071892, R37 DK42412, R37DK042412)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Ferroptosis and cancer prognosis
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Iron Metabolism and Disorders
Keywords
breast cancer, iron metabolism, prognostic gene signature, distant metastasis-free survival, risk stratification, estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer, ferroportin, SLC40A1, HFE gene, transferrin receptor, hepcidin, gene expression
MeSH terms
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols, Breast Neoplasms, Estrogens, Female, Humans, Iron, Lymphatic Metastasis, Models, Genetic, Neoplasms, Hormone-Dependent, Prognosis, Tamoxifen, Survival Analysis, Treatment Outcome, Chemotherapy, Adjuvant, Disease-Free Survival, Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal, Estrogen Receptor Modulators, Gene Expression Profiling

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review