Cited by 373PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling in cancerHER2/EGFR in Cancer ResearchMelanoma and MAPK Pathways

MEK Inhibition Leads to PI3K/AKT Activation by Relieving a Negative Feedback on ERBB Receptors

Open access
Turke, Alexa B., Song, Youngchul, Costa, Carlotta, Cook, Rebecca, Arteaga, Carlos L., Asara, John M., Engelman, Jeffrey A.·2012·Cancer Research

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

The phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K)/AKT and RAF/MEK/ERK signaling pathways are activated in a wide range of human cancers. In many cases, concomitant inhibition of both pathways is necessary to block proliferation and induce cell death and tumor shrinkage. Several feedback systems have been described in which inhibition of one intracellular pathway leads to activation of a parallel signaling pathway, thereby decreasing the effectiveness of single-agent targeted therapies. In this study, we describe a feedback mechanism in which MEK inhibition leads to activation of PI3K/AKT signaling in EGFR and HER2-driven cancers. We found that MEK inhibitor–induced activation of PI3K/AKT resulted from hyperactivation of ERBB3 as a result of the loss of an inhibitory threonine phosphorylation in the conserved juxtamembrane domains of EGFR and HER2. Mutation of this amino acid led to increased ERBB receptor activation and upregulation of the ERBB3/PI3K/AKT signaling pathway, which was no longer responsive to MEK inhibition. Taken together, these results elucidate an important, dominant feedback network regulating central oncogenic pathways in human cancer. Cancer Res; 72(13); 3228–37. ©2012 AACR.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1158/0008-5472.can-11-3747

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Inhibition of either PI3K/mTOR or ERK signaling often relieves feedback inhibition of the other and causes its activation.

    “Inhibition of either PI3K/mTOR or ERK signaling often relieves feedback inhibition of the other and causes its activation46,47.”
  • In NSCLCs and CRCs, KRASG12C inhibition leads to accumulation of activated upstream EGFR and/or other ERBB family members, facilitating escape from KRASG12C-inhibitor monotherapy.

    “In NSCLCs and CRCs, KRASG12C inhibition leads to an accumulation of activated upstream EGFR and/or other ERBB family members, which facilitates escape from KRASG12C-inhibitor monotherapy110,121–124.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Turke, A. B., Song, Y., Costa, C., Cook, R., Arteaga, C. L., Asara, J. M., & Engelman, J. A.
Affiliations
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Engelman, Jeffrey A.
Venue
Cancer Research
Published
2012-07-01
Volume
72
Issue
13
Pages
3228-3237
ISSN
  • 0008-5472 (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-7445
OpenAlex
W2105437003
Cited by
368
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 30 · 2016: 36 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 30 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 3
FWCI
9.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cancer Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Cancer Institute (P50 CA98131, R01 CA80195, P50CA127003, R01CA166480, U01CA141457, R01CA080195, R01CA140594, P50CA090578, K08CA120060, P50CA098131, P01CA120964, R01CA137008, P30CA006516)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling in cancer
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › HER2/EGFR in Cancer Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Melanoma and MAPK Pathways
Keywords
MEK inhibition, PI3K/Akt signaling, HER3, ErbB receptors, EGFR, HER2, negative feedback loop, Raf/MEK/ERK pathway, drug resistance, cancer pathways
MeSH terms
Cell Line, Enzyme Activation, Feedback, Flow Cytometry, Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinases, Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction, Receptor Protein-Tyrosine Kinases, Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Kinases, Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-akt, Tandem Mass Spectrometry, Gene Knockdown Techniques

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review