Cited by 42Protein Kinase Regulation and GTPase SignalingProtein Tyrosine PhosphatasesMelanoma and MAPK Pathways

The role of wild-type RAS in oncogenic RAS transformation

Open access
Sheffels, Erin, Kortum, Robert L.·2021·Genes

Abstract

The RAS family of oncogenes (HRAS, NRAS, and KRAS) are among the most frequently mutated protein families in cancers. RAS-mutated tumors were originally thought to proliferate independently of upstream signaling inputs, but we now know that non-mutated wild-type (WT) RAS proteins play an important role in modulating downstream effector signaling and driving therapeutic resistance in RAS-mutated cancers. This modulation is complex as different WT RAS family members have opposing functions. The protein product of the WT RAS allele of the same isoform as mutated RAS is often tumor-suppressive and lost during tumor progression. In contrast, RTK-dependent activation of the WT RAS proteins from the two non-mutated WT RAS family members is tumor-promoting. Further, rebound activation of RTK–WT RAS signaling underlies therapeutic resistance to targeted therapeutics in RAS-mutated cancers. The contributions of WT RAS to proliferation and transformation in RAS-mutated cancer cells places renewed interest in upstream signaling molecules, including the phosphatase/adaptor SHP2 and the RasGEFs SOS1 and SOS2, as potential therapeutic targets in RAS-mutated cancers.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/genes12050662

Cites

155 of 155 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The rationale for SHP2 and SOS1 inhibitors as pan-KRAS inhibitors is that several KRAS oncoproteins, including G12C, cycle between inactive and active states and rely on upstream activation and nucleotide exchange for full transforming potential.

    “The rationale for pursuing SHP2 and SOS1 inhibitors as pan-KRAS inhibitors is grounded in the evidence that several (K)RAS oncoproteins, including KRASG12C, still cycle between an inactive and active state and rely on upstream activation and nucleotide exchange to exhibit their full transforming potential (9–13, 33, 34).”
  • Pan-KRAS inhibitors and degraders could be prime choice for cancers driven by wild-type KRAS, such as KRAS wild-type amplified or NF1 loss, and Neurofibromatosis type 1.

    “Pan-KRAS inhibitors and degraders could also become the prime choice for cancers driven by wild-type KRAS, such as KRAS wild-type amplified or cancers driven by loss of the NF1 tumor suppressor, as well as Neurofibromatosis type 1 or its associated malignancies (34, 62, 63).”
  • Several drugs targeting KRAS indirectly are currently in development by interfering with nucleotide exchange and KRAS activation via SHP2 or SOS1 inhibition.

    “Several drugs targeting KRAS indirectly are currently in development by interfering with nucleotide exchange and KRAS activation via SHP2 or SOS1 inhibition [54,55,56,57,58].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 156 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sheffels, E., & Kortum, R. L.
Affiliations
Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences (US)
Corresponding author
Kortum, Robert L.
Venue
Genes
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2021-04-28
Volume
12
Issue
5
Pages
662
ISSN
2073-4425 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3158309248
Cited by
42
References
156
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4
FWCI
0.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Genes (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Congressionally Directed Medical Research Programs (LC180213)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Kinase Regulation and GTPase Signaling
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Tyrosine Phosphatases
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Melanoma and MAPK Pathways
Keywords
RAS wild-type, HRAS, NRAS, KRAS, receptor tyrosine kinase signaling, treatment resistance, SHP2, SOS1, SOS2, tumor suppression
MeSH terms
Animals, Cell Transformation, Neoplastic, Humans, ras Proteins, Drug Resistance, Neoplasm

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review