The DOI matches its Crossref record; 39 of the 39 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
CD73 Is Associated with Poor Prognosis in High-Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer
Abstract
The cell surface nucleotidase CD73 is an immunosuppressive enzyme involved in tumor progression and metastasis. Although preclinical studies suggest that CD73 can be targeted for cancer treatment, the clinical impact of CD73 in ovarian cancer remains unclear. In this study, we investigated the prognostic value of CD73 in high-grade serous (HGS) ovarian cancer using gene and protein expression analyses. Our results demonstrate that high levels of CD73 are significantly associated with shorter disease-free survival and overall survival in patients with HGS ovarian cancer. Furthermore, high levels of CD73 expression in ovarian tumor cells abolished the good prognosis associated with intraepithelial CD8+ cells. Notably, CD73 gene expression was highest in the C1/stromal molecular subtype of HGS ovarian cancer and positively correlated with an epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition gene signature. Moreover, in vitro studies revealed that CD73 and extracellular adenosine enhance ovarian tumor cell growth as well as expression of antiapoptotic BCL-2 family members. Finally, in vivo coinjection of ID8 mouse ovarian tumor cells with mouse embryonic fibroblasts showed that CD73 expression in fibroblasts promotes tumor immune escape and thereby tumor growth. In conclusion, our study highlights a role for CD73 as a prognostic marker of patient survival and also as a candidate therapeutic target in HGS ovarian cancers. Cancer Res; 75(21); 4494–503. ©2015 AACR.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Jemal, A., Siegel, R., Ward, E., Hao, Y., Xu, J., & Thun, M. J. (2009) · CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians · doi:10.3322/caac.20006 · Cited by 9,709
Intratumoral T Cells, Recurrence, and Survival in Epithelial Ovarian Cancer
Zhang, L., Conejo-Garcia, J. R., Katsaros, D., Gimotty, P. A., Massobrio, M., Regnani, G., Makrigiannakis, A., Gray, H., Schlienger, K., Liebman, M. N., et al. (2003) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa020177 · Cited by 3,397
Sato, E., Olson, S. H., Ahn, J., Bundy, B., Nishikawa, H., Qian, F., Jungbluth, A. A., Frosina, D., Gnjatic, S., Ambrosone, C., et al. (2005) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0509182102 · Cited by 2,372
Novel Molecular Subtypes of Serous and Endometrioid Ovarian Cancer Linked to Clinical Outcome
Tothill, R. W., Tinker, A. V., George, J., Brown, R., Fox, S. B., Lade, S., Johnson, D. S., Trivett, M. K., Etemadmoghadam, D., Locandro, B., et al. (2008) · Clinical Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-08-0196 · Cited by 1,467
Self-citationRethinking ovarian cancer: recommendations for improving outcomes
Vaughan, S., Coward, J. I., Bast, R. C., Berchuck, A., Berek, J. S., Brenton, J. D., Coukos, G., Crum, C. C., Drapkin, R., Etemadmoghadam, D., et al. (2011) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc3144 · Cited by 1,464
Kelm, J. M., Timmins, N. E., Brown, C. J., Fussenegger, M., & Nielsen, L. K. (2003) · Biotechnology and Bioengineering · doi:10.1002/bit.10655 · Cited by 934
Duraiswamy, J., Kaluza, K. M., Freeman, G. J., & Coukos, G. (2013) · Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/0008-5472.can-12-4100 · Cited by 745
Prognostic significance of tumor-infiltrating T cells in ovarian cancer: A meta-analysis
Hwang, W.-T., Adams, S. F., Tahirovic, E., Hagemann, I. S., & Coukos, G. (2012) · Gynecologic Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2011.09.039 · Cited by 661
Holmgaard, R. B., Zamarin, D., Munn, D. H., Wolchok, J. D., & Allison, J. P. (2013) · Journal of Experimental Medicine · doi:10.1084/jem.20130066 · Cited by 634
Rustin, G. J. S., Vergote, I., Eisenhauer, E., Pujade-Lauraine, E., Quinn, M., Thigpen, T., du Bois, A., Kristensen, G., Jakobsen, A., Sagae, S., et al. (2011) · International Journal of Gynecological Cancer · doi:10.1097/igc.0b013e3182070f17 · Cited by 625
Cited by
Primary, Adaptive, and Acquired Resistance to Cancer Immunotherapy
Sharma, P., Hu-Lieskovan, S., Wargo, J. A., & Ribas, A. (2017) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2017.01.017 · Cited by 5,588
The immune contexture in cancer prognosis and treatment
Fridman, W. H., Zitvogel, L., Sautès–Fridman, C., & Kroemer, G. (2017) · Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1038/nrclinonc.2017.101 · Cited by 2,263
The ectonucleotidases CD 39 and CD 73: Novel checkpoint inhibitor targets
Allard, B., Longhi, M. S., Robson, S. C., & Stagg, J. (2017) · Immunological Reviews · doi:10.1111/imr.12528 · Cited by 927
Self-citationPharmacology of Adenosine Receptors: The State of the Art
Borea, P. A., Gessi, S., Merighi, S., Vincenzi, F., & Varani, K. (2018) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00049.2017 · Cited by 783
Navigating metabolic pathways to enhance antitumour immunity and immunotherapy
Li, X., Wenes, M., Romero, P., Huang, S. C.-C., Fendt, S.-M., & Ho, P.-C. (2019) · Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1038/s41571-019-0203-7 · Cited by 733
Metadata
- Authors
- Turcotte, M., Spring, K., Pommey, S., Chouinard, G., Cousineau, I., George, J., Chen, G. M., Gendoo, D. M. A., Haibe-Kains, B., Karn, T., Rahimi, K., Le Page, C., Provencher, D., Mes-Masson, A.-M., & Stagg, J.
- Venue
- Cancer Research
- Published
- 2015-11-01
- Volume
- 75
- Issue
- 21
- Pages
- 4494-4503
- ISSN
- 0008-5472 (ISSN-L)
- 1538-7445
- OpenAlex
- W1947060780
- Cited by
- 257
- References
- 39
- FWCI
- 24.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: CD73 Is Associated with Poor Prognosis in High-Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1158/0008-5472.can-14-3569
- The paper
- Turcotte, M., Spring, K., Pommey, S., Chouinard, G., Cousineau, I., George, J., Chen, G. M., Gendoo, D. M. A., Haibe-Kains, B., Karn, T., Rahimi, K., Le Page, C., Provencher, D., Mes-Masson, A.-M., & Stagg, J. (2015). CD73 Is Associated with Poor Prognosis in High-Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer. Cancer Research. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.can-14-3569
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.