Cited by 153Colorectal Cancer Screening and DetectionGlobal Cancer Incidence and ScreeningGenetic factors in colorectal cancer

Global Increasing Incidence of Young-Onset Colorectal Cancer Across 5 Continents: A Joinpoint Regression Analysis of 1,922,167 Cases

Lui, Rashid N., Tsoi, Kelvin K.F., Ho, Jason M.W., Lo, C.M., Chan, Felix C.H., Kyaw, Moe H., Sung, Joseph J.Y.·2019·Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention

Abstract

Background: Colorectal cancer incidence among young adults in the United States is on the rise, but whether this phenomenon is present in other parts of the world is not well documented. This study aims to explore the temporal change of incidence rates for colorectal cancer in various countries across the globe. Methods: We extracted colorectal cancer incidence and population data from 1988 to 2007 based on data from the International Agency for Research on Cancer and compared incidence between age groups. Twelve representative jurisdictions from five continents were selected. Young-onset colorectal cancer cases were defined as those ages <50 years. Joinpoint regression was used to measure the trends of colorectal cancer incidence and to estimate the annual percent change (APC). Results: The APC for those ages <50 years was noted to be increasing at a faster rate as compared with those ages ≥50 years in many regions, including Australia (+1.10% vs. −0.35%), Brazil (+9.20% vs. +5.72%), Canada (+2.60% vs. −0.91%), China–Hong Kong (+1.82% vs. −0.10%), China–Shanghai (+1.13% vs. −2.68%), Japan (+2.63% vs. +0.90%), the United Kingdom (+3.33% vs. +0.77%), and the United States (+1.98% vs. −2.88%). These trends were largely driven by rectal cancer, except in Brazil and the United Kingdom. Conclusions: Increasing incidence of young-onset colorectal cancer was noted in many regions across the globe. Impact: Further studies focusing on young-onset colorectal cancer, particularly with regard to risk factors and establishing the optimal age of screening, are warranted.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-18-1111

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lui, R. N., Tsoi, K. K. F., Ho, J. M. W., Lo, C. M., Chan, F. C. H., Kyaw, M. H., & Sung, J. J. Y.
Affiliations
  • Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK)
  • 3Stanley Ho Big Data Decision Analytics Research Centre, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, N.T., Hong Kong.
Venue
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
Published
2019-08-01
Volume
28
Issue
8
Pages
1275-1282
ISSN
  • 1055-9965 (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-7755
OpenAlex
W2946387699
Cited by
153
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 4
FWCI
6.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Rare & Special e-Zone (The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology) (submittedVersion)
Funders
n/a (na)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Genetic factors in colorectal cancer
Keywords
early-onset colorectal cancer, colorectal cancer incidence, incidence trends, rectal cancer, age-specific incidence, cross-national comparison, annual percent change
MeSH terms
Global Burden of Disease, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Regression Analysis, Risk Factors, Global Health, Colorectal Neoplasms, Incidence, Databases, Factual, Age of Onset

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review