The DOI matches its Crossref record; 103 of the 105 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Targeting RAS Membrane Association: Back to the Future for Anti-RAS Drug Discovery?
Open accessAbstract
RAS proteins require membrane association for their biologic activity, making this association a logical target for anti-RAS therapeutics. Lipid modification of RAS proteins by a farnesyl isoprenoid is an obligate step in that association, and is an enzymatic process. Accordingly, farnesyltransferase inhibitors (FTI) were developed as potential anti-RAS drugs. The lack of efficacy of FTIs as anticancer drugs was widely seen as indicating that blocking RAS membrane association was a flawed approach to cancer treatment. However, a deeper understanding of RAS modification and trafficking has revealed that this was an erroneous conclusion. In the presence of FTIs, KRAS and NRAS, which are the RAS isoforms most frequently mutated in cancer, become substrates for alternative modification, can still associate with membranes, and can still function. Thus, FTIs failed not because blocking RAS membrane association is an ineffective approach, but because FTIs failed to accomplish that task. Recent findings regarding RAS isoform trafficking and the regulation of RAS subcellular localization have rekindled interest in efforts to target these processes. In particular, improved understanding of the palmitoylation/depalmitoylation cycle that regulates RAS interaction with the plasma membrane, endomembranes, and cytosol, and of the potential importance of RAS chaperones, have led to new approaches. Efforts to validate and target other enzymatically regulated posttranslational modifications are also ongoing. In this review, we revisit lessons learned, describe the current state of the art, and highlight challenging but promising directions to achieve the goal of disrupting RAS membrane association and subcellular localization for anti-RAS drug development. Clin Cancer Res; 21(8); 1819–27. ©2015 AACR. See all articles in this CCR Focus section, “Targeting RAS-Driven Cancers.”
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Therefore, inhibiting the activity of farnesyltransferase can prevent the farnesylation of KRAS and reduce its localization to the cell membrane, ultimately inhibiting the activity of KRAS.336”
From Recent advances in targeting the “undruggable” proteins: from drug discovery to clinical trials (2023) · cites this paper as [336]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Comprehensive Survey of Ras Mutations in Cancer
Prior, I. A., Lewis, P. D., & Mattos, C. (2012) · Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/0008-5472.can-11-2612 · Cited by 2,063 · cited 1×
“The three RAS genes (HRAS, NRAS, KRAS) are the most commonly mutated oncogenes in human cancers (1,2).”
BackgroundDrugging the undruggable RAS: Mission Possible?
Cox, A. D., Fesik, S. W., Kimmelman, A. C., Luo, J., & Der, C. J. (2014) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd4389 · Cited by 1,997
Self-citationRAS oncogenes: weaving a tumorigenic web
Pylayeva-Gupta, Y., Grabocka, E., & Bar-Sagi, D. (2011) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc3106 · Cited by 1,789
Hancock, J. F., Paterson, H., & Marshall, C. J. (1990) · Cell · doi:10.1016/0092-8674(90)90294-o · Cited by 1,042
K- and N-Ras Are Geranylgeranylated in Cells Treated with Farnesyl Protein Transferase Inhibitors
Whyte, D. B., Kirschmeier, P., Hockenberry, T. N., Nunez-Oliva, I., James, L., Catino, J. J., Bishop, W. R., & Pai, J.-K. (1997) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.272.22.14459 · Cited by 884
An Acylation Cycle Regulates Localization and Activity of Palmitoylated Ras Isoforms
Rocks, O., Peyker, A., Kahms, M., Verveer, P., Koerner, C., Lumbierres, M., Kuhlmann, J., Waldmann, H., Wittinghofer, A., & Bastiaens, P. (2005) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1105654 · Cited by 866
Stephen, A. G., Esposito, D., Bagni, R. K., & McCormick, F. (2014) · Cancer Cell · doi:10.1016/j.ccr.2014.02.017 · Cited by 795
Ras history: The saga continues
Cox, A. D., & Der, C. J. (2010) · Small GTPases · doi:10.4161/sgtp.1.1.12178 · Cited by 706
Self-citationTargeting protein prenylation for cancer therapy
Berndt, N., Hamilton, A. D., & Sebti, S. M. (2011) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc3151 · Cited by 614 · cited 3×
“Such inhibitors have been developed and some have reached the clinic (16,17), but have been limited by toxicity (21-23).”
BackgroundSmall molecule inhibition of the KRAS–PDEδ interaction impairs oncogenic KRAS signalling
Zimmermann, G., Papke, B., Ismail, S., Vartak, N., Chandra, A., Hoffmann, M., Hahn, S. A., Triola, G., Wittinghofer, A., Bastiaens, P. I. H., et al. (2013) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature12205 · Cited by 596
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Small molecules in targeted cancer therapy: advances, challenges, and future perspectives
Zhong, L., Li, Y., Xiong, L., Wang, W., Wu, M., Yuan, T., Yang, W. M., Tian, C., Miao, Z., Wang, T., et al. (2021) · Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy · doi:10.1038/s41392-021-00572-w · Cited by 1,813
KRAS Mutation: From Undruggable to Druggable in Cancer
Huang, L., Guo, Z., Wang, F., & Fu, L. (2021) · Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy · doi:10.1038/s41392-021-00780-4 · Cited by 1,127
RAS isoforms and mutations in cancer at a glance
Hobbs, G. A., Der, C. J., & Rossman, K. L. (2016) · Journal of Cell Science · doi:10.1242/jcs.182873 · Cited by 973
Self-citationLu, H., Zhou, Q., He, J., Jiang, Z., Peng, C., Tong, R., & Shi, J. (2020) · Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy · doi:10.1038/s41392-020-00315-3 · Cited by 891
Role of oncogenic KRAS in the diagnosis, prognosis and treatment of pancreatic cancer
Buscail, L., Bournet, B., & Cordelier, P. (2020) · Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology · doi:10.1038/s41575-019-0245-4 · Cited by 721
Metadata
- Authors
- Cox, A. D., Der, C. J., & Philips, M. R.
- Affiliations
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
- NYU Langone Health (US)
- Venue
- Clinical Cancer Research
- Published
- 2015-04-14
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1819-1827
- ISSN
- 1078-0432 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-3265
- PMC
- PMC4400837
- OpenAlex
- W2129653056
- Cited by
- 351
- References
- 105
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 46 · 2020: 39 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 43 · 2017: 40 · 2016: 28 · 2015: 18
- FWCI
- 4.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Clinical Cancer Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Carolina Digital Repository (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill) (submittedVersion)
- UNC Libraries
- Funders
- Pancreatic Cancer Action Network
- National Institutes of Health (5r01ca042978-30)
- National Cancer Institute (R01CA116034, R01CA175747, R01CA163489, R01-CA042978, R21CA179193)
- National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM055279)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Kinase Regulation and GTPase Signaling
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Tyrosine Phosphatases
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Sphingolipid Metabolism and Signaling
- Keywords
- farnesyltransferase inhibitors, KRAS, NRAS, depalmitoylation, post-translational modification, RAS-driven cancers
- MeSH terms
- Acetyltransferases, Acylation, Animals, Antineoplastic Agents, Carrier Proteins, Cell Membrane, Humans, Neoplasms, Endopeptidases, Phosphorylation, Protein Kinase C, Thiolester Hydrolases, Signal Transduction, Proto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras), Protein Prenylation, Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors, Alkyl and Aryl Transferases, Amino Acid Motifs, Protein Transport, Protein Interaction Domains and Motifs, Drug Discovery, Molecular Targeted Therapy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review