Cited by 49Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology ResearchGlycosylation and Glycoproteins ResearchPancreatitis Pathology and Treatment

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 42 of the 46 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The sTRA Plasma Biomarker: Blinded Validation of Improved Accuracy Over CA19-9 in Pancreatic Cancer Diagnosis

Open access

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Purpose: The CA19-9 biomarker is elevated in a substantial group of patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), but not enough to be reliable for the detection or diagnosis of the disease. We hypothesized that a glycan called sTRA (sialylated tumor-related antigen) is a biomarker for PDAC that improves upon CA19-9. Experimental Design: We examined sTRA and CA19-9 expression and secretion in panels of cell lines, patient-derived xenografts, and primary tumors. We developed candidate biomarkers from sTRA and CA19-9 in a training set of 147 plasma samples and used the panels to make case–control calls, based on predetermined thresholds, in a 50-sample validation set and a blinded, 147-sample test set. Results: The sTRA glycan was produced and secreted by pancreatic tumors and models that did not produce and secrete CA19-9. Two biomarker panels improved upon CA19-9 in the training set, one optimized for specificity, which included CA19-9 and 2 versions of the sTRA assay, and another optimized for sensitivity, which included 2 sTRA assays. Both panels achieved statistical improvement (P < 0.001) over CA19-9 in the validation set, and the specificity-optimized panel achieved statistical improvement (P < 0.001) in the blinded set: 95% specificity and 54% sensitivity (75% accuracy), compared with 97%/30% (65% accuracy). Unblinding produced further improvements and revealed independent, complementary contributions from each marker. Conclusions: sTRA is a validated serological biomarker of PDAC that yields improved performance over CA19-9. The new panels may enable surveillance for PDAC among people with elevated risk, or improved differential diagnosis among patients with suspected pancreatic cancer.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-18-3310

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

4 of the 46 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Staal, B., Liu, Y., Barnett, D., Hsueh, P., He, Z., Gao, C., Partyka, K., Hurd, M. W., Singhi, A. D., Drake, R. R., Huang, Y., Maitra, A., Brand, R. E., & Haab, B. B.
Affiliations
  • Van Andel Institute (US)
  • Fred Hutch Cancer Center (US)
  • The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (US)
  • University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (US)
  • Medical University of South Carolina (US)
Corresponding author
Haab, Brian B.
Venue
Clinical Cancer Research
Published
2019-05-01
Volume
25
Issue
9
Pages
2745-2754
ISSN
  • 1078-0432 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-3265
OpenAlex
W2910639478
Cited by
49
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 4
FWCI
3.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Clinical Cancer Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
NCI (U01 CA152653, U01 CA200466, U01 CA200468, U01 CA168896, U01 CA196403, P30 CA138313)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Glycosylation and Glycoproteins Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Pancreatitis Pathology and Treatment
Keywords
strA, CA19-9, pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, plasma biomarkers, glycan biomarkers, diagnostic accuracy, biomarker panel, tumor-associated glycosylation, cancer surveillance, differential diagnosis
MeSH terms
Aged, Animals, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Pancreatic Neoplasms, Prognosis, Tumor Cells, Cultured, Biomarkers, Tumor, Antigens, Tumor-Associated, Carbohydrate, Case-Control Studies, CA-19-9 Antigen, N-Acetylneuraminic Acid, Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal, Xenograft Model Antitumor Assays, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review