Cited by 374Cancer Immunotherapy and BiomarkersGenetic factors in colorectal cancerColorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Microsatellite Instable Subset of Colorectal Cancer Is a Particularly Good Candidate for Checkpoint Blockade Immunotherapy

Open access
Xiao, Yanping, Freeman, Gordon J.·2015·Cancer Discovery

Abstract

Summary: The microsatellite instable (MSI) subset of colorectal cancer exhibits an active Th1/CTL immune microenvironment, probably due to recognition of a high number of tumor neoantigens. However, the high expression of checkpoint molecules PD-1, PD-L1, CTLA-4, LAG-3, and IDO in MSI colorectal cancer distinguishes MSI from microsatellite stable colorectal cancer and creates an immunosuppressive microenvironment that may help MSI tumors evade immune destruction by the infiltrating immune cells. Though colorectal cancer does not have a good response rate to PD-1 pathway immunotherapy, these results suggest that the MSI subset of colorectal cancer is a particularly good candidate for checkpoint immunotherapy. Cancer Discov; 5(1); 16–8. ©2015 AACR. See related article by Llosa et al., p. 43

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1158/2159-8290.cd-14-1397

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 11 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 374

Metadata

Authors
Xiao, Y., & Freeman, G. J.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Freeman, Gordon J.
Venue
Cancer Discovery
Published
2015-01-01
Volume
5
Issue
1
Pages
16-18
ISSN
  • 2159-8274 (ISSN-L)
  • 2159-8290
OpenAlex
W2042797183
Cited by
368
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 54 · 2021: 44 · 2020: 36 · 2019: 46 · 2018: 35 · 2017: 40 · 2016: 37 · 2015: 14
FWCI
18.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cancer Discovery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Public Health Service (HHSN272201100018C)
  • National Cancer Institute (U54CA163125, P50CA101942)
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (HHSN272201100018C, P01AI056299)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Genetic factors in colorectal cancer
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies
Keywords
microsatellite instability, colorectal cancer, immune checkpoint blockade, PD-1, PD-L1, CTLA-4, LAG-3, IDO, tumor immune microenvironment, neoantigens, immunosuppression, immunotherapy response
MeSH terms
Colonic Neoplasms, Humans, Microsatellite Instability, Tumor Microenvironment, Cell Cycle Checkpoints

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review