Cited by 198Biochemical and Molecular ResearchCancer, Hypoxia, and MetabolismCancer, Lipids, and Metabolism

Adaptive Reprogramming of De Novo Pyrimidine Synthesis Is a Metabolic Vulnerability in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer

Open access
Brown, Kristin K., Spinelli, Jessica B., Asara, John M., Toker, Alex·2017·Cancer Discovery

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Chemotherapy resistance is a major barrier to the treatment of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), and strategies to circumvent resistance are required. Using in vitro and in vivo metabolic profiling of TNBC cells, we show that an increase in the abundance of pyrimidine nucleotides occurs in response to chemotherapy exposure. Mechanistically, elevation of pyrimidine nucleotides induced by chemotherapy is dependent on increased activity of the de novo pyrimidine synthesis pathway. Pharmacologic inhibition of de novo pyrimidine synthesis sensitizes TNBC cells to genotoxic chemotherapy agents by exacerbating DNA damage. Moreover, combined treatment with doxorubicin and leflunomide, a clinically approved inhibitor of the de novo pyrimidine synthesis pathway, induces regression of TNBC xenografts. Thus, the increase in pyrimidine nucleotide levels observed following chemotherapy exposure represents a metabolic vulnerability that can be exploited to enhance the efficacy of chemotherapy for the treatment of TNBC. Significance: The prognosis for patients with TNBC with residual disease after chemotherapy is poor. We find that chemotherapy agents induce adaptive reprogramming of de novo pyrimidine synthesis and show that this response can be exploited pharmacologically, using clinically approved inhibitors of de novo pyrimidine synthesis, to sensitize TNBC cells to chemotherapy. Cancer Discov; 7(4); 391–9. ©2017 AACR. See related article by Mathur et al., p. 380. This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 339

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1158/2159-8290.cd-16-0611

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Inducing DNA damage with genotoxic chemotherapies can sensitize cells to inhibitors of nucleotide biosynthesis.

    “Inducing DNA damage with the use of genotoxic chemotherapies can sensitize cells to inhibitors of nucleotide biosynthesis (Brown et al., 2017; Peters et al., 2000), suggesting that oncogenic mutations that reduce the DNA damage response is one explanation for why a therapeutic window exists for antimetabolite compounds.”

    From Targeting Metabolism for Cancer Therapy (2017) · cites this paper as Brown et al., 2017

  • DHODH activity is elevated in response to DNA damage and upon genotoxic chemotherapy treatment to increase nucleotide synthesis for DNA repair.

    “DHODH activity is also elevated in response to DNA damage and upon genotoxic chemotherapy treatment to increase nucleotide synthesis for DNA repair.76,77”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [1]Isakoff SJ Triple-negative breast cancer: role of specific chemotherapy agents Cancer J 2010 16 53 61 20164691 PMC2882502
  2. [18]Collins KD Stark GR Aspartate transcarbamylase. Interaction with the transition state analogue N-(phosphonacetyl)-L-aspartate J Biol Chem 1971 246 6599 6605 4943676

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Brown, K. K., Spinelli, J. B., Asara, J. M., & Toker, A.
Affiliations
  • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
  • Brown, Kristin K.
  • Toker, Alex
Venue
Cancer Discovery
Published
2017-04-01
Volume
7
Issue
4
Pages
391-399
ISSN
  • 2159-8274 (ISSN-L)
  • 2159-8290
OpenAlex
W2592487518
Cited by
198
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 31 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 7
FWCI
8.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cancer Discovery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Cancer Institute (R01CA200671)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Biochemical and Molecular Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer, Lipids, and Metabolism
Keywords
triple-negative breast cancer, de novo pyrimidine biosynthesis, pyrimidine nucleotides, chemoresistance, metabolic vulnerability, leflunomide, doxorubicin, DNA damage, metabolic reprogramming
MeSH terms
Leflunomide, Animals, Antineoplastic Agents, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols, DNA Damage, Doxorubicin, Female, Humans, Isoxazoles, Pyrimidines, Apoptosis, Drug Resistance, Neoplasm, Xenograft Model Antitumor Assays, Cell Line, Tumor, Mice, Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms, Cellular Reprogramming

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review