Cited by 39

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

MOZ and Menin–MLL Complexes Are Complementary Regulators of Chromatin Association and Transcriptional Output in Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor

Hemming, Matthew L., Benson, Morgan R., Loycano, Michael A., Anderson, Justin A., Andersen, Jessica L., Taddei, Madeleine L., Krivtsov, Andrei V., Aubrey, Brandon J., Cutler, Jevon A., Hatton, Charlie, Sicinska, Ewa, Armstrong, Scott A.·2022·Cancer Discovery

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) is commonly characterized by activating mutations in the receptor tyrosine kinase KIT. Tyrosine kinase inhibitors are the only approved therapy for GIST, and complementary treatment strategies are urgently needed. As GIST lacks oncogene amplification and relies upon an established network of transcription factors, we hypothesized that unique chromatin-modifying enzymes are essential in orchestrating the GIST epigenome. We identified through genome-scale CRISPR screening that MOZ and Menin–MLL chromatin regulatory complexes are cooperative and unique dependencies in GIST. These complexes were enriched at GIST-relevant genes and regulated their transcription. Inhibition of MOZ and Menin–MLL complexes decreased GIST cell proliferation by disrupting interactions with transcriptional/chromatin regulators, such as DOT1L. MOZ and Menin inhibition caused significant reductions in tumor burden in vivo, with superior effects observed with combined Menin and KIT inhibition. These results define unique chromatin regulatory dependencies in GIST and identify potential therapeutic strategies for clinical application. Significance: Although many malignancies rely on oncogene amplification, GIST instead depends upon epigenetic regulation of KIT and other essential genes. Utilizing genome-scale CRISPR dependency screens, we identified complementary chromatin-modifying complexes essential to GIST and characterize the consequences of their disruption, elucidating a novel therapeutic approach to this disease. This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 1599

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1158/2159-8290.cd-21-0646

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 54

  1. Corless, 2008, Molecular pathobiology of gastrointestinal stromal sarcomas, Annu Rev Pathol Mech Dis, 3, 557, 10.1146/annurev.pathmechdis.3.121806.151538 · DOI
  2. Hemming, 2018, Translational insights into gastrointestinal stromal tumor and current clinical advances, Ann Oncol, 3, 557
  3. Demetri, 2002, Efficacy and safety of imatinib mesylate in advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors, N Engl J Med, 347, 472, 10.1056/NEJMoa020461 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Blay, 2020, Ripretinib in patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumours (INVICTUS): a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial, Lancet Oncol, 21, 923, 10.1016/S1470-2045(20)30168-6 · DOI
  5. Antonescu, 2005, Acquired resistance to imatinib in gastrointestinal stromal tumor occurs through secondary gene mutation, Clin Cancer Res, 11, 4182, 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-04-2245 · DOI
  6. Demetri, 2006, Efficacy and safety of sunitinib in patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumour after failure of imatinib: a randomised controlled trial, Lancet, 368, 1329, 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69446-4 · DOI
  7. Tabone, 2005, KIT overexpression and amplification in gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs), Biochim Biophys Acta, 1741, 165, 10.1016/j.bbadis.2005.03.011 · DOI
  8. Chi, 2010, ETV1 is a lineage survival factor that cooperates with KIT in gastrointestinal stromal tumours, Nature, 467, 849, 10.1038/nature09409 · DOI
  9. Ran, 2018, FOXF1 defines the core-regulatory circuitry in gastrointestinal stromal tumor, Cancer Discov, 8, 234, 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-17-0468 · DOI
  10. Hemming, 2018, Gastrointestinal stromal tumor enhancers support a transcription factor network predictive of clinical outcome, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 115, E5746, 10.1073/pnas.1802079115 · DOI
  11. Hemming, 2021, HAND1 and BARX1 act as transcriptional and anatomic determinants of malignancy in gastrointestinal stromal tumor, Clin Cancer Res, 27, 1706, 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-20-3538 · DOI
  12. Chen, 2014, Chromatin modifiers and remodellers: regulators of cellular differentiation, Nat Rev Genet, 15, 93, 10.1038/nrg3607 · DOI
  13. Voss, 2009, Moz and retinoic acid coordinately regulate H3K9 acetylation, hox gene expression, and segment identity, Dev Cell, 17, 674, 10.1016/j.devcel.2009.10.006 · DOI
  14. Yang, 2007, MOZ and MORF, two large MYSTic HATs in normal and cancer stem cells, Oncogene, 26, 5408, 10.1038/sj.onc.1210609 · DOI
  15. Krivtsov, 2007, MLL translocations, histone modifications and leukaemia stem-cell development, Nat Rev Cancer, 7, 823, 10.1038/nrc2253 · DOI
  16. Barretina, 2012, The Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia enables predictive modelling of anticancer drug sensitivity, Nature, 483, 603, 10.1038/nature11003 · DOI · Paper page
  17. McDonald, 2017, Project DRIVE: a compendium of cancer dependencies and synthetic lethal relationships uncovered by large-scale, deep RNAi screening, Cell, 170, 577, 10.1016/j.cell.2017.07.005 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Laugesen, 2016, Role of the polycomb repressive complex 2 (PRC2) in transcriptional regulation and cancer, Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med, 6, a026575, 10.1101/cshperspect.a026575 · DOI
  19. Hemming, 2019, Enhancer domains in gastrointestinal stromal tumor regulate KIT expression and are targetable by BET bromodomain inhibition, Cancer Res, 79, 994, 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-18-1888 · DOI
  20. Kaya-Okur, 2019, CUT&Tag for efficient epigenomic profiling of small samples and single cells, Nat Commun, 10, 1930, 10.1038/s41467-019-09982-5 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Corless, 2004, Biology of gastrointestinal stromal tumors, J Clin Oncol, 22, 3813, 10.1200/JCO.2004.05.140 · DOI
  22. Baell, 2018, Inhibitors of histone acetyltransferases KAT6A/B induce senescence and arrest tumour growth, Nature, 560, 253, 10.1038/s41586-018-0387-5 · DOI
  23. Krivtsov, 2019, A Menin-MLL inhibitor induces specific chromatin changes and eradicates disease in models of MLL-rearranged leukemia, Cancer Cell, 36, 660, 10.1016/j.ccell.2019.11.001 · DOI
  24. Bamborough, 2016, GSK6853, a chemical probe for inhibition of the BRPF1 bromo­domain, ACS Med Chem Lett, 7, 552, 10.1021/acsmedchemlett.6b00092 · DOI
  25. Meier, 2017, Selective targeting of bromodomains of the bromo­domain-PHD fingers family impairs osteoclast differentiation, ACS Chem Biol, 12, 2619, 10.1021/acschembio.7b00481 · DOI
  26. Lambert, 2015, Proximity biotinylation and affinity purification are complementary approaches for the interactome mapping of chromatin-associated protein complexes, J Proteomics, 118, 81, 10.1016/j.jprot.2014.09.011 · DOI
  27. Ullah, 2008, Molecular architecture of quartet MOZ/MORF histone acetyltransferase complexes, Mol Cell Biol, 28, 6828, 10.1128/MCB.01297-08 · DOI
  28. Blotta, 2009, Identification of novel antigens with induced immune response in monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance, Blood, 114, 3276, 10.1182/blood-2009-04-219436 · DOI
  29. Daigle, 2011, Selective killing of mixed lineage leukemia cells by a potent small-molecule DOT1L inhibitor, Cancer Cell, 20, 53, 10.1016/j.ccr.2011.06.009 · DOI
  30. Li, 2015, FGFR-mediated reactivation of MAPK signaling attenuates antitumor effects of imatinib in gastrointestinal stromal tumors, Cancer Discov, 5, 438, 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-14-0763 · DOI
  31. Voss, 2012, MOZ regulates the Tbx1 locus, and moz mutation partially phenocopies DiGeorge syndrome, Dev Cell, 23, 652, 10.1016/j.devcel.2012.07.010 · DOI
  32. Matkar, 2013, Menin: a scaffold protein that controls gene expression and cell signaling, Trends Biochem Sci, 38, 394, 10.1016/j.tibs.2013.05.005 · DOI
  33. Yokoyama, 2005, The menin tumor suppressor protein is an essential oncogenic cofactor for MLL-associated leukemogenesis, Cell, 123, 207, 10.1016/j.cell.2005.09.025 · DOI
  34. Dafflon, 2017, Complementary activities of DOT1L and Menin inhibitors in MLL-rearranged leukemia, Leukemia, 31, 1269, 10.1038/leu.2016.327 · DOI
  35. Paggetti, 2010, Crosstalk between leukemia-associated proteins MOZ and MLL regulates HOX gene expression in human cord blood CD34+ cells, Oncogene, 29, 5019, 10.1038/onc.2010.254 · DOI
  36. Miyamoto, 2020, Activation of CpG-rich promoters mediated by MLL drives MOZ-rearranged leukemia, Cell Rep, 32, 108200, 10.1016/j.celrep.2020.108200 · DOI
  37. Dzama, 2020, Synergistic targeting of FLT3 mutations in AML via combined menin-MLL and FLT3 inhibition, Blood, 136, 2442, 10.1182/blood.2020005037 · DOI
  38. Yan, 2022, KAT6A and ENL form an epigenetic transcriptional control module to drive critical leukemogenic gene-expression programs, Cancer Discov, 12, 792, 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-20-1459 · DOI
  39. Dreijerink, 2017, Enhancer-mediated oncogenic function of the menin tumor suppressor in breast cancer, Cell Rep, 18, 2359, 10.1016/j.celrep.2017.02.025 · DOI
  40. Okada, 2005, hDOT1L links histone methylation to leukemogenesis, Cell, 121, 167, 10.1016/j.cell.2005.02.020 · DOI
  41. Wong, 2017, The histone methyltransferase DOT1L promotes neuroblastoma by regulating gene transcription, Cancer Res, 77, 2522, 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-16-1663 · DOI
  42. Vatapalli, 2020, Histone methyltransferase DOT1L coordinates AR and MYC stability in prostate cancer, Nat Commun, 11, 4153, 10.1038/s41467-020-18013-7 · DOI
  43. Klossowski, 2020, Menin inhibitor MI-3454 induces remission in MLL1-rearranged and NPM1-mutated models of leukemia, J Clin Invest, 130, 981, 10.1172/JCI129126 · DOI
  44. Xu, 2020, Discovery of M-808 as a highly potent, covalent, small-molecule inhibitor of the Menin-MLL interaction with strong in vivo antitumor activity, J Med Chem, 63, 4997, 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.0c00547 · DOI
  45. Maki, 2015, Key issues in the clinical management of gastrointestinal stromal tumors: an expert discussion, Oncologist, 20, 823, 10.1634/theoncologist.2014-0471 · DOI
  46. Hemming, 2008, Proteomic profiling of gamma-secretase substrates and mapping of substrate requirements, PLoS Biol, 6, e2571, 10.1371/journal.pbio.0060257 · DOI · Paper page
  47. Fei, 2019, Deciphering essential cistromes using genome-wide CRISPR screens, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 116, 25186, 10.1073/pnas.1908155116 · DOI
  48. Wang, 2019, Integrative analysis of pooled CRISPR genetic screens using MAGeCKFlute, Nat Protoc, 14, 756, 10.1038/s41596-018-0113-7 · DOI
  49. Zhou, 2019, Metascape provides a biologist-oriented resource for the analysis of systems-level datasets, Nat Commun, 10, 1523, 10.1038/s41467-019-09234-6 · DOI · Paper page
  50. Labun, 2016, CHOPCHOP v2: a web tool for the next generation of CRISPR genome engineering, Nucleic Acids Res, 44, W272, 10.1093/nar/gkw398 · DOI
  51. Dobin, 2012, STAR: ultrafast universal RNA-seq aligner, Bioinformatics, 29, 15, 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts635 · DOI · Paper page
  52. Trapnell, 2010, Transcript assembly and quantification by RNA-seq reveals unannotated transcripts and isoform switching during cell differentiation, Nat Biotechnol, 28, 511, 10.1038/nbt.1621 · DOI · Paper page
  53. Langmead, 2009, Ultrafast and memory-efficient alignment of short DNA sequences to the human genome, Genome Biol, 10, R25., 10.1186/gb-2009-10-3-r25 · DOI · Paper page
  54. Feng, 2012, Identifying ChIP-seq enrichment using MACS, Nat Protoc, 7, 1728, 10.1038/nprot.2012.101 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Hemming, M. L., Benson, M. R., Loycano, M. A., Anderson, J. A., Andersen, J. L., Taddei, M. L., Krivtsov, A. V., Aubrey, B. J., Cutler, J. A., Hatton, C., Sicinska, E., & Armstrong, S. A.
Affiliations
  • 1Department of Medical Oncology, Sarcoma Center, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
  • 2Department of Pediatric Oncology and Division of Hematology/Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston Children's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
  • 3Department of Oncologic Pathology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Venue
Cancer Discovery
Published
2022-05-02
Volume
12
Issue
7
Pages
1804-1823
ISSN
  • 2159-8274
  • 2159-8290
Cited by
39
References
7
Language
en
Funders
NIH (R01 CA176745, UL 1TR002541, K08 CA245235)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review