Cited by 3Glioma Diagnosis and TreatmentCancer Immunotherapy and BiomarkersCancer Genomics and Diagnostics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Somatic Mutations in HLA Class Genes and Antigen-Presenting Molecules in Malignant Glioma

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Immune evasion is a hallmark of gliomas, yet the genetic mechanisms by which tumors escape immune surveillance remain incompletely understood. In this study, we systematically examined the presence of somatic mutations in HLA genes and genes encoding proteins involved in antigen presentation across isocitrate dehydrogenase wild-type and mutant gliomas using targeted next-generation sequencing. To address the challenges associated with detecting somatic mutations in these highly polymorphic and complex regions of the genome, we applied a combination of short-read and long-read sequencing techniques, extended the genetic region of interest (exons and introns), and applied a tailored bioinformatics analysis pipeline, which enabled an accurate evaluation of comprehensive sequencing data. Our analysis identified mutations in HLA class II and nonclassic HLA genes as well as genes associated with antigen presentation, such as TAP1/2 and B2M. Three-dimensional modeling of individual mutations simulated the potential impact of somatic mutations in TAP1 and B2M on the encoded protein configuration. The presence of somatic mutations supports the role of antigen-presenting genes in the pathophysiology and potential immune escape of gliomas. Our data demonstrated an increased frequency of such mutations in recurrent glioblastoma, potentially resulting from a positive selection or mutagenic enrichment of tumor cells during tumor progression. Taken together, this research generates new insights and hypotheses for the functional analysis and optimization of immunotherapy strategies for gliomas, which may guide personalized treatment paradigms.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1158/2326-6066.cir-24-0419

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 54

  1. Bockmayr, 2019, Immunologic profiling of mutational and transcriptional subgroups in pediatric and adult high-grade gliomas, Cancer Immunol Res, 7, 1401, 10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-18-0939 · DOI
  2. Lim, 2018, Current state of immunotherapy for glioblastoma, Nat Rev Clin Oncol, 15, 422, 10.1038/s41571-018-0003-5 · DOI
  3. Hazini, 2021, Deregulation of HLA-I in cancer and its central importance for immunotherapy, J Immunother Cancer, 9, e002899, 10.1136/jitc-2021-002899 · DOI
  4. Sharma, 2017, Primary, adaptive, and acquired resistance to cancer immunotherapy, Cell, 168, 707, 10.1016/j.cell.2017.01.017 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Nduom, 2015, Immunosuppressive mechanisms in glioblastoma, Neuro Oncol, 17, vii9, 10.1093/neuonc/nov151 · DOI
  6. Rossjohn, 2015, T cell antigen receptor recognition of antigen-presenting molecules, Annu Rev Immunol, 33, 169, 10.1146/annurev-immunol-032414-112334 · DOI
  7. Fangazio, 2021, Genetic mechanisms of HLA-I loss and immune escape in diffuse large B cell lymphoma, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 118, e2104504118, 10.1073/pnas.2104504118 · DOI
  8. McGranahan, 2017, Allele-specific HLA loss and immune escape in lung cancer evolution, Cell, 171, 1259, 10.1016/j.cell.2017.10.001 · DOI · Paper page
  9. del Campo, 2014, Immune escape of cancer cells with beta2-microglobulin loss over the course of metastatic melanoma, Int J Cancer, 134, 102, 10.1002/ijc.28338 · DOI
  10. He, 2022, B2M mutation paves the way for immune tolerance in pathogenesis of Epstein-Barr virus positive diffuse large B-cell lymphomas, J Cancer, 13, 3615, 10.7150/jca.75813 · DOI
  11. Shukla, 2015, Comprehensive analysis of cancer-associated somatic mutations in class I HLA genes, Nat Biotechnol, 33, 1152, 10.1038/nbt.3344 · DOI
  12. Köster, 2018, Snakemake-a scalable bioinformatics workflow engine, Bioinformatics, 34, 3600, 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty350 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Robinson, 2020, IPD-IMGT/HLA database, Nucleic Acids Res, 48, D948
  14. Li, 2009, The sequence alignment/map format and SAMtools, Bioinformatics, 25, 2078, 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp352 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Cibulskis, 2013, Sensitive detection of somatic point mutations in impure and heterogeneous cancer samples, Nat Biotechnol, 31, 213, 10.1038/nbt.2514 · DOI
  16. McKenna, 2010, The Genome Analysis Toolkit: a MapReduce framework for analyzing next-generation DNA sequencing data, Genome Res, 20, 1297, 10.1101/gr.107524.110 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Kim, 2018, Strelka2: fast and accurate calling of germline and somatic variants, Nat Methods, 15, 591, 10.1038/s41592-018-0051-x · DOI
  18. Marçais, 2011, A fast, lock-free approach for efficient parallel counting of occurrences of k-mers, Bioinformatics, 27, 764, 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr011 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Robinson, 2011, Integrative genomics viewer, Nat Biotechnol, 29, 24, 10.1038/nbt.1754 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Johnson, 2008, NCBI BLAST: a better web interface, Nucleic Acids Res, 36, W5, 10.1093/nar/gkn201 · DOI
  21. Tuominen, 2010, ImmunoRatio: a publicly available web application for quantitative image analysis of estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and Ki-67, Breast Cancer Res, 12, R56, 10.1186/bcr2615 · DOI
  22. Mohme, 2020, Molecular profiling of an osseous metastasis in glioblastoma during checkpoint inhibition: potential mechanisms of immune escape, Acta Neuropathol Commun, 8, 28, 10.1186/s40478-020-00906-9 · DOI
  23. Akyüz, 2017, T-cell diversification reflects antigen selection in the blood of patients on immune checkpoint inhibition and may be exploited as liquid biopsy biomarker, Int J Cancer, 140, 2535, 10.1002/ijc.30549 · DOI
  24. Bolotin, 2015, MiXCR: software for comprehensive adaptive immunity profiling, Nat Methods, 12, 380, 10.1038/nmeth.3364 · DOI
  25. Pettersen, 2004, UCSF Chimera?A visualization system for exploratory research and analysis, J Comput Chem, 25, 1605, 10.1002/jcc.20084 · DOI
  26. Gaudet, 2001, Structure of the ABC ATPase domain of human TAP1, the transporter associated with antigen processing, EMBO J, 20, 4964, 10.1093/emboj/20.17.4964 · DOI
  27. Varadi, 2022, AlphaFold Protein Structure Database: massively expanding the structural coverage of protein-sequence space with high-accuracy models, Nucleic Acids Res, 50, D439, 10.1093/nar/gkab1061 · DOI · Paper page
  28. Chan, 2018, Divergent T-cell receptor recognition modes of a HLA-I restricted extended tumour-associated peptide, Nat Commun, 9, 1026, 10.1038/s41467-018-03321-w · DOI
  29. Ashkenazy, 2016, ConSurf 2016: an improved methodology to estimate and visualize evolutionary conservation in macromolecules, Nucleic Acids Res, 44, W344, 10.1093/nar/gkw408 · DOI · Paper page
  30. Landau, 2005, ConSurf 2005: the projection of evolutionary conservation scores of residues on protein structures, Nucleic Acids Res, 33, W299, 10.1093/nar/gki370 · DOI
  31. Wiel, 2019, MetaDome: pathogenicity analysis of genetic variants through aggregation of homologous human protein domains, Hum Mutat, 40, 1030
  32. Karczewski, 2020, The mutational constraint spectrum quantified from variation in 141,456 humans, Nature, 581, 434, 10.1038/s41586-020-2308-7 · DOI · Paper page
  33. Landrum, 2018, ClinVar: improving access to variant interpretations and supporting evidence, Nucleic Acids Res, 46, D1062, 10.1093/nar/gkx1153 · DOI · Paper page
  34. Adzhubei, 2010, A method and server for predicting damaging missense mutations, Nat Methods, 7, 248, 10.1038/nmeth0410-248 · DOI · Paper page
  35. Cheng, 2023, Accurate proteome-wide missense variant effect prediction with AlphaMissense, Science, 381, eadg7492, 10.1126/science.adg7492 · DOI · Paper page
  36. Xie, 2010, DNA damage and oxidative stress in human liver cell L-02 caused by surface water extracts during drinking water treatment in a waterworks in China, Environ Mol Mutagen, 51, 229, 10.1002/em.20537 · DOI
  37. Ioannidis, 2016, REVEL: an ensemble method for predicting the pathogenicity of rare missense variants, Am J Hum Genet, 99, 877, 10.1016/j.ajhg.2016.08.016 · DOI · Paper page
  38. Kircher, 2014, A general framework for estimating the relative pathogenicity of human genetic variants, Nat Genet, 46, 310, 10.1038/ng.2892 · DOI · Paper page
  39. Touat, 2020, Mechanisms and therapeutic implications of hypermutation in gliomas, Nature, 580, 517, 10.1038/s41586-020-2209-9 · DOI
  40. Dilthey, 2019, HLA*LA—HLA typing from linearly projected graph alignments, Bioinformatics, 35, 4394, 10.1093/bioinformatics/btz235 · DOI
  41. Townsend, 1993, The transporters associated with antigen presentation, Semin Cell Biol, 4, 53, 10.1006/scel.1993.1007 · DOI
  42. Horak, 2022, Standards for the classification of pathogenicity of somatic variants in cancer (oncogenicity): joint recommendations of clinical genome resource (ClinGen), cancer genomics consortium (CGC), and variant interpretation for cancer consortium (VICC), Genet Med, 24, 986, 10.1016/j.gim.2022.01.001 · DOI
  43. Sukhai, 2016, A classification system for clinical relevance of somatic variants identified in molecular profiling of cancer, Genet Med, 18, 128, 10.1038/gim.2015.47 · DOI
  44. Eggensperger, 2015, The transporter associated with antigen processing: a key player in adaptive immunity, Biol Chem, 396, 1059, 10.1515/hsz-2014-0320 · DOI
  45. Zhou, 2018, Electrostatic interactions in protein structure, folding, binding, and condensation, Chem Rev, 118, 1691, 10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00305 · DOI
  46. Iwata, 2007, High-resolution crystal structure of beta2-microglobulin formed at pH 7.0, J Biochem, 142, 413, 10.1093/jb/mvm148 · DOI
  47. Trinh, 2002, Crystal structure of monomeric human β-2-microglobulin reveals clues to its amyloidogenic properties, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 99, 9771, 10.1073/pnas.152337399 · DOI
  48. Li, 2016, The implication and significance of beta 2 microglobulin: a conservative multifunctional regulator, Chin Med J (Engl), 129, 448, 10.4103/0366-6999.176084 · DOI
  49. Culshaw, 2017, Germline bias dictates cross-serotype reactivity in a common dengue-virus-specific CD8+ T cell response, Nat Immunol, 18, 1228, 10.1038/ni.3850 · DOI
  50. Loll, 2020, Conformational plasticity of HLA-B27 molecules correlates inversely with efficiency of negative T cell selection, Front Immunol, 11, 179, 10.3389/fimmu.2020.00179 · DOI
  51. Tang, 2021, Predicting protein surface property with its surface hydrophobicity, Protein Pept Lett, 28, 938, 10.2174/18755305MTE0oNDQ54 · DOI
  52. Betts, 2007, Amino Acid Properties and Consequences of Substitutions
  53. Yeung, 2013, LOH in the HLA class I region at 6p21 is associated with shorter survival in newly diagnosed adult glioblastoma, Clin Cancer Res, 19, 1816, 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-12-2861 · DOI
  54. Alexandrov, 2013, Signatures of mutational processes in human cancer, Nature, 500, 415, 10.1038/nature12477 · DOI · Paper page

Metadata

Authors
Schulte, S. C., Peter, W., Rosenberger, G., Schäfer, M., Maire, C. L., Rünger, A., Ryba, A., Riecken, K., Fita, K. D., Matschke, J., Akyüz, N., Dierlamm, J., Klau, G. W., Ricklefs, F. L., Gempt, J., Westphal, M., Lamszus, K., Dilthey, A., & Mohme, M.
Affiliations
  • Düsseldorf University Hospital (DE)
  • University of Cologne (DE)
  • University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (DE)
  • 4Stefan Morsch Stiftung, Birkenfeld, Germany.
  • 7Laboratory for Brain Tumor Biology, Department of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
  • Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf (DE)
  • Universität Hamburg (DE)
Venue
Cancer Immunology Research
Published
2025-05-05
Volume
13
Issue
7
Pages
1111-1123
ISSN
  • 2326-6066 (ISSN-L)
  • 2326-6074
OpenAlex
W4410091406
Cited by
3
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2
FWCI
1.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Cancer Immunology Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (01EO2106)
  • Jürgen Manchot Foundation (428994620)
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (MO4183, RO 3660/7)
  • Anni Hofmann Foundation
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
Keywords
somatic mutations, HLA class II genes, HLA class I genes, antigen presentation, high-grade glioma, glioblastoma, immune evasion, IDH mutation, TAP1, TAP2, beta2-microglobulin, recurrent glioblastoma, cancer immunotherapy, protein structure modeling
MeSH terms
ATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily B, Member 2, Brain Neoplasms, Glioma, HLA Antigens, Humans, Isocitrate Dehydrogenase, Mutation, Antigen Presentation, Computational Biology, High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review