The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Peritoneal Adhesions: Etiology, Pathophysiology, and Clinical Significance
Abstract
Aim: To summarize the most common etiologic factors and describe the pathophysiology in the formation of peritoneal adhesions, to outline their clinical significance and consequences, and to evaluate the pharmacologic, mechanical, and surgical adjuvant strategies to minimize peritoneal adhesion formation. Methods: We performed an extensive MEDLINE search of the internationally published English literature of all medical and epidemiological journal articles, textbooks, scientific reports, and scientific journals from 1940 to 1997. We also reviewed reference lists in all the articles retrieved in the search as well as those of major texts regarding intraperitoneal postsurgical adhesion formation. All sources identified were reviewed with particular attention to risk factors, pathophysiology, clinical manifestations, various methods, and innovative techniques for effectively and safely reducing the formation of postsurgical adhesions. Results: The formation of postoperative peritoneal adhesions is an important complication following gynecological and general abdominal surgery, leading to clinical and significant economical consequences. Adhesion occur in more than 90% of the patients following major abdominal surgery and in 55–100% of the women undergoing pelvic surgery. Small-bowel obstruction, infertility, chronic abdominal and pelvic pain, and difficult reoperative surgery are the most common consequences of peritoneal adhesions. Despite elaborate efforts to develop effective strategies to reduce or prevent adhesions, their formation remains a frequent occurrence after abdominal surgery. Conclusions: Until additional information and findings from future clinical investigations exist, only a meticulous surgical technique can be advocated in order to reduce unnecessary morbidity and mortality rates from these untoward effects of surgery.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Peritoneal adhesions and their relation to abdominal surgery
Weibel, M.-A., & Majno, G. (1973) · The American Journal of Surgery · doi:10.1016/s0002-9610(73)80123-0 · Cited by 463
Cited by
Consequences and complications of peritoneal adhesions
Van Goor, H. (2007) · Colorectal Disease · doi:10.1111/j.1463-1318.2007.01358.x · Cited by 320
Conditional macrophage ablation in transgenic mice expressing a Fas-based suicide gene
Burnett, S. H., Kershen, E. J., Zhang, J., Zeng, L., Straley, S. C., Kaplan, A. M., & Cohen, D. A. (2004) · Journal of Leukocyte Biology · doi:10.1189/jlb.0903442 · Cited by 307
Abdominal adhesions: Current and novel therapies
Ward, B. C., & Panitch, A. (2011) · Journal of Surgical Research · doi:10.1016/j.jss.2009.09.015 · Cited by 249
Prevention of Post-Operative Adhesions: A Comprehensive Review of Present and Emerging Strategies
Fatehi Hassanabad, A., Zarzycki, A. N., Jeon, K., Dundas, J. A., Vasanthan, V., Deniset, J. F., & Fedak, P. W. M. (2021) · Biomolecules · doi:10.3390/biom11071027 · Cited by 178
Liao, J., Li, X., & Fan, Y. (2023) · Bioactive Materials · doi:10.1016/j.bioactmat.2023.02.026 · Cited by 124
Metadata
- Authors
- Liakakos, T., Thomakos, N., Fine, P. M., Dervenis, C., & Young, R. L.
- Venue
- Digestive Surgery
- Publisher
- S. Karger AG
- Published
- 2001
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 260-273
- ISSN
- 0253-4886 (ISSN-L)
- 1421-9883
- OpenAlex
- W2028453113
- Cited by
- 686
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 10.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Peritoneal Adhesions: Etiology, Pathophysiology, and Clinical Significance. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1159/000050149
- The paper
- Liakakos, T., Thomakos, N., Fine, P. M., Dervenis, C., & Young, R. L. (2001). Peritoneal Adhesions: Etiology, Pathophysiology, and Clinical Significance. Digestive Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1159/000050149
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.