The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Psychoacoustic Characterization of the Tinnitus Spectrum: Implications for the Underlying Mechanisms of Tinnitus
Abstract
In this study, an original psychometric procedure was used in order to characterize in more detail than in previous studies the different perceptual components of tinnitus, i.e. auditory sensations which are perceived in the absence of a corresponding external acoustic stimulus. Ten subjects with chronic tinnitus were asked to rate on a numeric scale the contribution of elementary pitch sensations evoked by isolated frequency components to their overall tinnitus sensation. The resulting ‘internal tinnitus spectra’, which represented the estimated perceptual contribution to the tinnitus sensation as a function of frequency over a large range of frequencies, were found to occupy a wide frequency range corresponding largely to that at which hearing thresholds were abnormally elevated. In most cases, they exhibited a broad peak falling within the hearing loss range. This pattern of result suggests that in subjects with high-frequency hearing loss, tinnitus sensations, when present, resemble those evoked by high-frequency noise bands with, in some cases, a superimposed tonal-like pitch. These results confirm and extend earlier results in the literature and agree with the patients’ reports; their practical implications for the design of future studies on tinnitus and theoretical implications for the understanding of the neurophysiological mechanisms underlying tinnitus are discussed. The results of an additional experiment showed that the internal tinnitus spectrum could be altered by perceptual training in a fine frequency discrimination task with tones in the frequency range of the main peak of the tinnitus spectrum.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Recanzone, G., Schreiner, C., & Merzenich, M. (1993) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.13-01-00087.1993 · Cited by 1,266
Cited by
Baguley, D., McFerran, D., & Hall, D. (2013) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(13)60142-7 · Cited by 1,245
Eggermont, J. J., & Roberts, L. E. (2004) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/j.tins.2004.08.010 · Cited by 991
Maladaptive plasticity in tinnitus — triggers, mechanisms and treatment
Shore, S. E., Roberts, L. E., & Langguth, B. (2016) · Nature Reviews Neurology · doi:10.1038/nrneurol.2016.12 · Cited by 474
Noreña, A. J., & Eggermont, J. J. (2005) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.2226-04.2005 · Cited by 337
Knipper, M., Van Dijk, P., Nunes, I., Rüttiger, L., & Zimmermann, U. (2013) · Progress in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.pneurobio.2013.08.002 · Cited by 309
Metadata
- Authors
- Norena, A., Micheyl, C., Chéry-Croze, S., & Collet, L.
- Venue
- Audiology and Neurotology
- Publisher
- S. Karger AG
- Published
- 2002
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 358-369
- ISSN
- 1420-3030 (ISSN-L)
- 1421-9700
- OpenAlex
- W2091649478
- Cited by
- 382
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 1.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Psychoacoustic Characterization of the Tinnitus Spectrum: Implications for the Underlying Mechanisms of Tinnitus. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1159/000066156
- The paper
- Norena, A., Micheyl, C., Chéry-Croze, S., & Collet, L. (2002). Psychoacoustic Characterization of the Tinnitus Spectrum: Implications for the Underlying Mechanisms of Tinnitus. Audiology and Neurotology. https://doi.org/10.1159/000066156
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.