Cited by 905Mental Health and PsychiatryParanormal Experiences and BeliefsPhilosophy and Theoretical Science

EASE: Examination of Anomalous Self-Experience

Parnas, Josef, Møller, Paul, Kircher, Tilo, Thalbitzer, Jørgen, Jansson, Lennart, Handest, Peter, Zahavi, Dan·2005·Psychopathology

Abstract

Review Articles| October 06 2005 EASE: Examination of Anomalous Self-Experience Subject Area: Psychiatry and Psychology Josef Parnas; Josef Parnas aDepartment of Psychiatry, Hvidovre Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark; dDanish National Research Foundation, Center for Subjectivity Research, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark Search for other works by this author on: This Site PubMed Google Scholar Paul Møller; Paul Møller bUnit for Mental Health Research and Development, Division of Psychiatry, Buskerud Hospital, Lier, Norway; Search for other works by this author on: This Site PubMed Google Scholar Tilo Kircher; Tilo Kircher cDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Aachen, Aachen, Germany; Search for other works by this author on: This Site PubMed Google Scholar Jørgen Thalbitzer; Jørgen Thalbitzer aDepartment of Psychiatry, Hvidovre Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark; Search for other works by this author on: This Site PubMed Google Scholar Lennart Jansson; Lennart Jansson aDepartment of Psychiatry, Hvidovre Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark; Search for other works by this author on: This Site PubMed Google Scholar Peter Handest; Peter Handest aDepartment of Psychiatry, Hvidovre Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark; Search for other works by this author on: This Site PubMed Google Scholar Dan Zahavi Dan Zahavi dDanish National Research Foundation, Center for Subjectivity Research, U…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1159/000088441

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Parnas, J., Møller, P., Kircher, T., Thalbitzer, J., Jansson, L., Handest, P., & Zahavi, D.
Affiliations
  • University of Copenhagen (DK)
  • RWTH Aachen University (DE)
Venue
Psychopathology
Publisher
S. Karger AG
Published
2005
Volume
38
Issue
5
Pages
236-258
ISSN
  • 0254-4962 (ISSN-L)
  • 1423-033X
OpenAlex
W2032604835
Cited by
905
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 66 · 2025: 64 · 2024: 69 · 2023: 75 · 2022: 68 · 2021: 61 · 2020: 52 · 2019: 53 · 2018: 48 · 2017: 50 · 2016: 59 · 2015: 52 · 2014: 32 · 2013: 36 · 2012: 37
FWCI
86.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychopathology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (publishedVersion)
  • RWTH Publications (RWTH Aachen) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Mental Health and Psychiatry
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Paranormal Experiences and Beliefs
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Philosophy and Theoretical Science
Keywords
anomalous self-experiences, self-experience, self-awareness, self-concept, self-representation, self-knowledge, subjectivity, first-person experience, phenomenology
MeSH terms
Awareness, Cognition Disorders, Humans, Neuropsychological Tests, Obsessive Behavior, Psychometrics, Surveys and Questionnaires, Schizophrenia, Schizophrenic Psychology, Self Concept, Thinking, Reproducibility of Results, Metaphor

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review