Cited by 251Medication Adherence and ComplianceBreast Cancer Treatment StudiesCancer survivorship and care

Adherence to endocrine therapy for breast cancer

Chlebowski, Rowan T., Geller, Michelle L.·2006·Oncology

Abstract

Purpose: Despite the demonstrated efficacy of long-duration adjuvant tamoxifen and aromatase inhibitor use in breast cancer management, information on adherence to such therapy is limited. Therefore, we reviewed the published literature regarding hormonal therapy adherence in clinical trial and practice settings. Methods: A systematic search of the PubMed database, augmented by a review of manuscript references and conference proceedings, commonly identified adherence reports in clinical trials but identified only 9 adherence reports in clinical practice settings. Results: In adjuvant breast cancer clinical trials with longer (≧4 years) follow-up, hormonal therapy (tamoxifen or aromatase inhibitors) was prematurely discontinued by about 23–28% of the study participants. Adherence to aromatase inhibitors did not differ from adherence to tamoxifen in this setting. In breast cancer prevention trials, tamoxifen was prematurely discontinued by 20–46% of the participants. In clinical practice settings, only 2 reports addressed longer-duration (>4 years) adherence to adjuvant tamoxifen use. In these, tamoxifen was prematurely discontinued by 30–50% of the patients. Conclusion: Adherence to prescribed breast cancer hormone therapy has not received concerted attention. Current, albeit limited, evidence suggests long-term hormone therapy adherence may represent an area limiting optimal breast cancer patient treatment.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1159/000100444

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chlebowski, R. T., & Geller, M. L.
Affiliations
The Lundquist Institute (US)
Venue
Oncology
Publisher
S. Karger AG
Published
2006
Volume
71
Issue
1-2
Pages
1-9
ISSN
  • 0030-2414 (ISSN-L)
  • 1423-0232
OpenAlex
W1540562253
Cited by
251
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 22
FWCI
3.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Oncology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
AstraZeneca
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Medication Adherence and Compliance
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
Keywords
medication adherence, breast cancer, adjuvant endocrine therapy, tamoxifen, aromatase inhibitors, premature discontinuation, Breast Cancer Prevention Trial
MeSH terms
Administration, Oral, Breast Neoplasms, Clinical Trials as Topic, Female, Humans, Patient Compliance, Tamoxifen, Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal, Aromatase Inhibitors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review