Cited by 174Obesity, Physical Activity, DietPharmacology and Obesity TreatmentObesity and Health Practices

A Systematic Review of the Effectiveness of Group versus Individual Treatments for Adult Obesity

Open access
Paul-Ebhohimhen, Virginia, Avenell, Alison·2009·Obesity Facts

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Both group and individual modes of delivery are employed for obesity treatments. Commercial weight loss groups commonly employ group-based delivery, while many clinical based settings employ one-to-one delivery. We systematically reviewed randomised controlled trials of treatments for adult obesity to compare the effectiveness of group-based to individual-based modes of treatment delivery. METHODS: We searched 7 electronic databases and 2 journals and reviewed secondary references, based on a priori criteria to systematically review: randomised controlled trials of obesity treatments, participants with BMI >or=28 kg/m(2), age >or=18 years, comparison groups including at least 1 group-based and 1 individual-based treatment group, and follow-up >or=1 year. We extracted data and conducted meta-analysis of weight change. RESULTS: Eleven comparison groups from 5 qualifying trials were obtained, representing a total participant pool of 336. Significantly greater (p = 0.03) weight change at 12 months was found in group-based over individualbased treatment, and sub-analyses showed that increased effectiveness was associated with the use of financial reward and psychologist-led interventions. CONCLUSION: Group-based interventions were more effective than individual-based interventions among a predominantly female participant pool receiving psychologist-led interventions. Future studies to explore differences by professional group and interventions among men, which are accompanied by economic evaluation, are recommended.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1159/000186144

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Paul-Ebhohimhen, V., & Avenell, A.
Affiliations
University of Aberdeen (GB)
Venue
Obesity Facts
Publisher
S. Karger AG
Published
2009
Volume
2
Issue
1
Pages
17-24
ISSN
  • 1662-4025 (ISSN-L)
  • 1662-4033
OpenAlex
W1987185279
Cited by
174
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 7
FWCI
5.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Obesity Facts (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Pharmacology and Obesity Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Obesity and Health Practices
Keywords
adult obesity, group intervention, individual-based interventions, weight loss, monetary rewards, weight change
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Behavior Therapy, Diet, Dietetics, Female, Humans, Life Style, Male, Middle Aged, Obesity, Social Support, Weight Loss, Body Mass Index, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review