Cited by 79Psychosomatic Disorders and Their TreatmentsCancer survivorship and carePsychometric Methodologies and Testing

Diagnosis and measurement of subjective incompetence: the clinical hallmark of demoralization

Cockram, Cheryl A., Doros, Gheorghe, de Figueiredo, John M.·2009·Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics

Abstract

Background: This article presents the development and application of a method to diagnose and measure subjective incompetence, the clinical hallmark of demoralization. Methods: The subjects (n = 112) were patients with cancer at a consultation clinic of a cancer center. They completed a questionnaire on general background information, the Brief Cope Scale, and a newly developed scale to measure subjective incompetence. The development and psychometric properties of this scale were studied. Data analysis included both univariate and bivariate statistical tests and an examination of the intercorrelations between the subjective incompetence scores and the scores on the Brief Cope Scale. Results: The scale for subjective incompetence was found to have adequate reliability and validity. Conclusions: The proposed scale will allow us to determine if the distinction between depression and demoralization has practical implications and to what extent and to further clarify the role of demoralization in the etiology and pathogenesis of both physical illnesses and mental disorders. The combined use of this scale with the existing criteria and scales for demoralization will highlight the role of subjective incompetence in converting what might have been a normal response to stress into an abnormal state requiring intervention.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1159/000235737

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cockram, C. A., Doros, G., & de Figueiredo, J. M.
Affiliations
  • University of South Florida (US)
  • Boston University (US)
Venue
Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics
Publisher
S. Karger AG
Published
2009
Volume
78
Issue
6
Pages
342-345
ISSN
  • 0033-3190 (ISSN-L)
  • 1423-0348
OpenAlex
W2094263743
Cited by
79
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 5
FWCI
4.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
Keywords
demoralization, depression, cancer patients, Brief COPE scale, coping, scale development, psychometric properties, stress response, psychosomatic disorders
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Morale, Neoplasms, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Psychophysiologic Disorders, Stress, Psychological, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review