The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Endotoxins and Other Sepsis Triggers
Abstract
Endotoxin, or more accurately termed bacterial lipopolysaccharide (LPS), is recognized as the most potent microbial mediator implicated in the pathogenesis of sepsis and septic shock. Yet despite its discovery well over a century ago, the fundamental role of circulating endotoxin in the blood of most patients with septic shock remains enigmatic and a subject of considerable controversy. LPS is the most prominent 'alarm molecule' sensed by the host's early warning system of innate immunity presaging the threat of invasion of the internal milieu by Gram-negative bacterial pathogens. In small doses within a localized tissue space, LPS signaling is advantageous to the host in orchestrating an appropriate antimicrobial defense and bacterial clearance mechanisms. Conversely, the sudden release of large quantities of LPS into the bloodstream is clearly deleterious to the host, initiating the release of a dysregulated and potentially lethal array of inflammatory mediators and procoagulant factors in the systemic circulation. The massive host response to this single bacterial pattern recognition molecule is sufficient to generate diffuse endothelial injury, tissue hypoperfusion, disseminated intravascular coagulation and refractory shock. Numerous attempts to block endotoxin activity in clinical trials with septic patients have met with inconsistent and largely negative results. Yet the groundbreaking discoveries within the past decade into the precise molecular basis for LPS-mediated cellular activation and tissue injury has rekindled optimism that a new generation of therapies that specifically disrupt LPS signaling might succeed. Other microbial mediators found in Gram-positive bacterial and viral and fungal pathogens are now appreciated to activate many of the same host defense networks induced by LPS. This information is providing novel interventions in the continuing effots to improve the care of septic patients.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The epidemiology of sepsis in the United States from 1979 through 2000
Martin, G. S., Mannino, D. M., Eaton, S., & Moss, M. (2003) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa022139 · Cited by 5,841
Opal, S. M., Scannon, P. J., Vincent, J., White, M., Carroll, S. F., Palardy, J. E., Parejo, N. A., Pribble, J. P., & Lemke, J. H. (1999) · The Journal of Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1086/315093 · Cited by 609
Self-citation
Cited by
Taverniti, V., & Guglielmetti, S. (2011) · Genes & Nutrition · doi:10.1007/s12263-011-0218-x · Cited by 703
Standardized bacteriophage purification for personalized phage therapy
Luong, T., Salabarria, A.-C., Edwards, R. A., & Roach, D. R. (2020) · Nature Protocols · doi:10.1038/s41596-020-0346-0 · Cited by 274
Berghe, T. V., Demon, D., Bogaert, P., Vandendriessche, B., Goethals, A., Depuydt, B., Vuylsteke, M., Roelandt, R., Van Wonterghem, E., Vandenbroecke, J., et al. (2014) · American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1164/rccm.201308-1535oc · Cited by 173
Lin, T.-L., Shu, C.-C., Chen, Y.-M., Lu, J.-J., Wu, T.-S., Lai, W.-F., Tzeng, C.-M., Lai, H.-C., & Lu, C.-C. (2020) · Frontiers in Pharmacology · doi:10.3389/fphar.2020.00554 · Cited by 143
Chen, S., Tang, C., Ding, H., Wang, Z., Liu, X., Chai, Y., Jiang, W., Han, Y., & Zeng, H. (2020) · Frontiers in Immunology · doi:10.3389/fimmu.2020.594071 · Cited by 132
Metadata
- Authors
- Opal, S. M.
- Venue
- Contributions to Nephrology
- Publisher
- S. Karger AG
- Published
- 2010
- Volume
- 167
- Pages
- 14-24
- ISSN
- 0302-5144 (ISSN-L)
- 1662-2782
- OpenAlex
- W1549003425
- Cited by
- 256
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 42.42
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Endotoxins and Other Sepsis Triggers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1159/000315915
- The paper
- Opal, S. M. (2010). Endotoxins and Other Sepsis Triggers. Contributions to Nephrology. https://doi.org/10.1159/000315915
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.