Cited by 191Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesCriminal Law and PolicyForensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis

Ranking the Harm of Alcohol, Tobacco and Illicit Drugs for the Individual and the Population

van Amsterdam, Jan, Opperhuizen, Antoon, Koeter, Maarten, van den Brink, Wim·2010·European Addiction Research

Abstract

Drug policy makers continuously face a changing pattern of drug use, i.e. new drugs appear on the market, the popularity of certain drugs changes or drugs are used in another way or another combination. For legislative purposes, drugs have mostly been classified according to their addictive potency. Such classifications, however, lack a scientific basis. The present study describes the results of a risk assessment study where 19 recreational drugs (17 illicit drugs plus alcohol and tobacco) used in the Netherlands have been ranked by a Dutch expert panel according to their harm based on the scientific state of the art. The study applies a similar approach as recently applied by Nutt et al. [Lancet 2007;369:1047–1053], so that the results of both studies could be compared. The harm indicators scored are acute and chronic toxicity, addictive potency and social harm. The aim of this study is to evaluate whether the legal classification of drugs in the Netherlands corresponds with the ranking of the drugs according to their science-based ranking of harm. Based on the results, recommendations are formulated about the legal classification of recreational drugs at national and international level which serves a rational approach for drug control.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1159/000317249

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
van Amsterdam, J., Opperhuizen, A., Koeter, M., & van den Brink, W.
Affiliations
  • National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (NL)
  • Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam (NL)
Venue
European Addiction Research
Publisher
S. Karger AG
Published
2010
Volume
16
Issue
4
Pages
202-207
ISSN
  • 1022-6877 (ISSN-L)
  • 1421-9891
OpenAlex
W2035199049
Cited by
191
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 9
FWCI
9.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Addiction Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (submittedVersion)
  • Rivm Repository (Netherlands National Institute for Public Health and the Environment) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Criminal Law and Policy
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Toxicology › Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis
Keywords
recreational drugs, illicit drugs, alcohol, tobacco, drug classification, drug policy, risk assessment, acute and chronic toxicity, social harm, expert panel, Netherlands
MeSH terms
Alcohol Drinking, Ethanol, Drug and Narcotic Control, Humans, Netherlands, Public Health, Illicit Drugs, Policy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review