Cited by 354Psychedelics and Drug StudiesForensic Toxicology and Drug AnalysisAlkaloids: synthesis and pharmacology

The abuse potential of medical psilocybin according to the 8 factors of the Controlled Substances Act

Open access
Johnson, Matthew W., Griffiths, Roland R., Hendricks, Peter S., Henningfield, Jack E.·2018·Neuropharmacology

Abstract

This review assesses the abuse potential of medically-administered psilocybin, following the structure of the 8 factors of the US Controlled Substances Act (CSA). Research suggests the potential safety and efficacy of psilocybin in treating cancer-related psychiatric distress and substance use disorders, setting the occasion for this review. A more extensive assessment of abuse potential according to an 8-factor analysis would eventually be required to guide appropriate schedule placement. Psilocybin, like other 5-HT2A agonist classic psychedelics, has limited reinforcing effects, supporting marginal, transient non-human self-administration. Nonetheless, mushrooms with variable psilocybin content are used illicitly, with a few lifetime use occasions being normative among users. Potential harms include dangerous behavior in unprepared, unsupervised users, and exacerbation of mental illness in those with or predisposed to psychotic disorders. However, scope of use and associated harms are low compared to prototypical abused drugs, and the medical model addresses these concerns with dose control, patient screening, preparation and follow-up, and session supervision in a medical facility. CONCLUSIONS: (1) psilocybin has an abuse potential appropriate for CSA scheduling if approved as medicine; (2) psilocybin can provide therapeutic benefits that may support the development of an approvable New Drug Application (NDA) but further studies are required which this review describes; (3) adverse effects of medical psilocybin are manageable when administered according to risk management approaches; and (4) although further study is required, this review suggests that placement in Schedule IV may be appropriate if a psilocybin-containing medicine is approved. This article is part of the Special Issue entitled 'Psychedelics: New Doors, Altered Perceptions'.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2018.05.012

Cites

180 of 180 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Barrigar RH, 1964 The Regulation of Psychedelic Drugs. The Psychedelic Review 1, 394– 441.
  2. Drug Enforcement Administration, 2017b Schedules of Controlled Substances: Placement of FDA-Approved Products of Oral Solutions Containing Dronabinol [(−)-delta-9-trans-tetrahydrocannabinol (delta-9-THC)] in Schedule II. In: Justice, U. S. D. o., (Ed). Federal Register, pp. 14815– 14820. https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2017/03/23/2017-05809/schedules-of-controlled-substances-placement-of-fda-approved-products-of-oral-solutions-containing 28355049
  3. Griffiths R, Johnson M, 2015 The Case for Rescheduling Psilocybin as a Treatment Medication: Regulatory Rationale, Abuse Liability, Safety, and Treatment Efficacy. Conference on Problems of Drug Dependence, Phoenix, Arizona.
  4. Lewin L, 1998 Phantastica: a classic survey on the use and abuse of mind-altering plants Park Street Press, Rochester, Vt xvi, 288 p.
  5. Penner J, 2015 The Rise and Fall of LSD Los Angeles Review of Books https://lareviewofbooks.org/article/the-rise-and-fall-of-lsd/#!
  6. Wasson RG, 1959 The hallucinogenic mushrooms of Mexico: an adventure in enthomycological exploration. Trans. N. Y. Acad. Sci 21, 325.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Johnson, M. W., Griffiths, R. R., Hendricks, P. S., & Henningfield, J. E.
Affiliations
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • University of Alabama (US)
Corresponding author
Johnson, Matthew W.
Venue
Neuropharmacology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-11
Volume
142
Pages
143-166
ISSN
0028-3908 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2806419184
Cited by
354
References
180
Citations by year
2026: 36 · 2025: 61 · 2024: 57 · 2023: 55 · 2022: 60 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 33 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1
FWCI
3.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neuropharmacology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Heffter Research Institute
  • NIH (RO1DA03889)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychedelics and Drug Studies
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Toxicology › Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Alkaloids: synthesis and pharmacology
Keywords
psilocybin, abuse liability, Controlled Substances Act, drug scheduling, classic psychedelics, substance use disorders, adverse effects, psychosis, risk management, dose control
MeSH terms
Animals, Drug and Narcotic Control, Hallucinogens, Humans, Psilocybin, Substance-Related Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review