Cited by 57Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome ResearchPersonality Disorders and PsychopathologyPersonality Traits and Psychology

Personality features and personality disorders in chronic fatigue syndrome: a population-based study

Open access
Nater, Urs M., Jones, James F., Lin, Jin-Mann S., Maloney, Elizabeth, Reeves, William C., Heim, Christine·2010·Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) presents unique diagnostic and management challenges. Personality may be a risk factor for CFS and may contribute to the maintenance of the illness. METHODS: 501 study participants were identified from the general population of Georgia: 113 people with CFS, 264 with unexplained unwellness but not CFS (insufficient fatigue, ISF) and 124 well controls. We used the Personality Diagnostic Questionnaire, 4th edition, to evaluate DSM-IV personality disorders. We used the NEO Five-Factor Inventory to assess personality features (neuroticism, extraversion, openness, agreeableness and conscientiousness). The Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory measured 5 dimensions of fatigue, and the Medical Outcomes Survey Short Form 36 measured 8 dimensions of functional impairment. RESULTS: Twenty-nine percent of the CFS cases had at least 1 personality disorder, compared to 28% of the ISF cases and 7% of the well controls. The prevalence of paranoid, schizoid, avoidant, obsessive-compulsive and depressive personality disorders were significantly higher in CFS and ISF compared to the well controls. The CFS cases had significantly higher scores on neuroticism, and significantly lower scores on extraversion than those with ISF or the well controls. Personality features were correlated with selected composite characteristics of fatigue. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that CFS is associated with an increased prevalence of maladaptive personality features and personality disorders. This might be associated with being noncompliant with treatment suggestions, displaying unhealthy behavioral strategies and lacking a stable social environment. Since maladaptive personality is not specific to CFS, it might be associated with illness per se rather than with a specific condition.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1159/000319312

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Neuroticism is presumed to be one of the predisposing factors of CFS in biopsychosocial accounts.

    “neuroticism is presumed to be one of the predisposing factors of CFS in [4-5,34] in biopsychosocial accounts.”

    From Cognitive behavior therapy in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome: The role of illness acceptance and neuroticism. (2013) · cites this paper as [34]

    The Discussion proposes that neuroticism might mediate the relationship between stress and CFS symptoms, supporting a possible predisposing role. It also says whether personality predisposes to CFS or results from it awaits empirical evaluation. Our copy does not identify this proposal as part of a biopsychosocial account; page numbers are unavailable. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nater, U. M., Jones, J. F., Lin, J.-M. S., Maloney, E., Reeves, W. C., & Heim, C.
Affiliations
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US)
  • Emory University (US)
Corresponding author
Reeves, William C.
Venue
Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics
Publisher
S. Karger AG
Published
2010
Volume
79
Issue
5
Pages
312-318
ISSN
  • 0033-3190 (ISSN-L)
  • 1423-0348
OpenAlex
W2024817081
Cited by
57
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 14
FWCI
6.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Energy
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
  • Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
Keywords
chronic fatigue syndrome, personality disorders, personality traits, neuroticism, extraversion, paranoid personality disorder, schizoid personality disorder, avoidant personality disorder, obsessive-compulsive personality disorder, depressive personality disorder, fatigue behavior, functional disability, treatment non-adherence
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Personality, Personality Assessment, Personality Disorders, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Fatigue Syndrome, Chronic, Statistics, Nonparametric, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review