CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 102Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome ResearchPersonality Disorders and PsychopathologyPsychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 52 of the 52 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Personality dimensions in the chronic fatigue syndrome: A comparison with multiple sclerosis and depression

Johnson, Susan K., DeLuca, John, Natelson, Benjamin H.·1996·Journal of Psychiatric Research
DOI 10.1016/0022-3956(95)00040-2
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This study investigated the relative rates of personality disturbance in chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS). Individuals who met the CDC criteria for CFS were compared to two other fatiguing illness groups, mild multiple sclerosis and depression, as well as sedentary healthy controls. Subjects were administered a structured psychiatric interview to determine Axis I psychiatric disorders and two self-report instruments to assess Axis II personality disorders and the personality trait of neuroticism. The depressed group had significantly more personality disorders and elevated neuroticism scores compared with the other three groups. The CFS and MS subjects had intermediary personality scores which were significantly higher than healthy controls. The CFS group with concurrent depressive disorder (34% of the CFS group) was found to account for most of the personality pathology in the CFS sample. The results are discussed in the context of the relationship between personality variables and fatiguing illness.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0022-3956(95)00040-2

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Bornstein, 1990, Content bias in the MMMPI Sc scale in neurological patients, Neuropsychiatry, Neuropsychology, and Behavioral Neurology, 3, 200
  2. Stricklin, 1988, Objective measurement of personality variables in epidemic neuromyastenia peatients, South African Medical Journal, 77, 31

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Metadata

Authors
Johnson, S. K., DeLuca, J., & Natelson, B. H.
Affiliations
Kessler Institute for Rehabilitation (US)
Corresponding author
Johnson, Susan K.
ORCID
Venue
Journal of Psychiatric Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1996-01
Volume
30
Issue
1
Pages
9-20
ISSN
0022-3956 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/0022-3956(95)00040-2
OpenAlex
W2137993260
Cited by
102
References
52
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 5
FWCI
4.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
  • Journal of Psychiatric Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
U.S. Public Health Service (U01A1-32247)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
Keywords
chronic fatigue syndrome, personality disorders, neuroticism, multiple sclerosis, depression, personality pathology
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Depressive Disorder, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Multiple Sclerosis, Neurotic Disorders, Personality Disorders, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Psychometrics, Reference Values, Sick Role, Fatigue Syndrome, Chronic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review