CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 52Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome ResearchPersonality Traits and PsychologyLong-Term Effects of COVID-19

Personality and chronic fatigue syndrome: methodological and conceptual issues

van Geelen, Stefan M., Sinnema, Gerben, Hermans, Hubert J.M., Kuis, Wietse·2007·Clinical Psychology Review
DOI 10.1016/j.cpr.2007.01.010
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Among clinical psychologists, consulting physicians, scientific researchers and society in general an image has emerged of patients with chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) as perfectionist, conscientious, hardworking, somewhat neurotic and introverted individuals with high personal standards, a great desire to be socially accepted and with a history of continuously pushing themselves past their limits. The aim of this article is to (a) give a concise review of the main recent studies on personality and CFS, (b) address the major methodological problems in the study of personality in CFS and (c) discuss some of the conceptual assumptions that seem to limit the research on personality and CFS. The results of the reviewed studies range from no evidence of major differences between the personalities of patients with CFS and controls, to evidence of severe psychopathology and personality disorder in patients with CFS. Although personality seems to play a role in CFS, it is difficult to draw general conclusions on the relation between personality and CFS. It is argued that this is partially due to the diversity and heterogeneity in study methods, patient populations, control groups and CFS case definitions. Personality should be regarded as an important factor to be studied in CFS. However, additional studies are needed, not focusing exclusively on personality disorder, or personality considered on a general trait level. In recent developments in personality research, the continually evolving life narrative that makes sense of, and gives direction to, an individual's life is also regarded as an important aspect of personality. New insights into personality and CFS might be gained by systematically studying the self-narratives of patients with the syndrome.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cpr.2007.01.010

Cites

157 of 157 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

4 of the 161 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Authors
van Geelen, S. M., Sinnema, G., Hermans, H. J. M., & Kuis, W.
Affiliations
  • University Medical Center Utrecht (NL)
  • Radboud University Nijmegen (NL)
Corresponding author
Kuis, Wietse
ORCID
Hermans, Hubert J.M.
Venue
Clinical Psychology Review
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-12
Volume
27
Issue
8
Pages
885-903
ISSN
0272-7358 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.cpr.2007.01.010
OpenAlex
W2048347260
Cited by
52
References
161
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 3
FWCI
0.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
Locations
  • Clinical Psychology Review (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Long-Term Effects of COVID-19
Keywords
chronic fatigue syndrome, personality, personality disorders, psychopathology, personality traits, life stories, self-narrative, case definition, methodological issues
MeSH terms
Culture, Humans, Life Change Events, Models, Psychological, Personality, Personality Assessment, Personality Disorders, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Psychometrics, Research, Research Design, Social Change, Fatigue Syndrome, Chronic, Narration

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review