Cited by 90Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchAmyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis ResearchAlzheimer's disease research and treatments

Gray Matter Atrophy in Behavioral Variant Frontotemporal Dementia: A Meta-Analysis of Voxel-Based Morphometry Studies

Pan, Ping Lei, Song, Wei, Yang, Jing, Huang, Rui, Chen, Ke, Gong, Qi Yong, Zhong, Jian Guo, Shi, Hai Chun +1 more·2012·Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Structural neuroimaging studies on behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD) using the voxel-based morphometry (VBM) method reported not entirely consistent findings. METHODS: A systematic review of VBM studies of bvFTD patients and healthy controls (HC) published in PubMed and Embase databases from 2000 to June 2011 was conducted. Meta-analysis was performed using a newly improved voxel-based meta-analytic tool, namely, effect size signed differential mapping, to quantitatively explore the gray matter (GM) changes between bvFTD patients and HC subjects. RESULTS: 11 VBM studies involving 237 bvFTD patients and 297 HC subjects met the inclusion criteria. Considerable regional GM volume decrease was detected in the anterior medial frontal cortex (BA 9), extending to other frontal areas (BA 8, 10, 46, 24, 32), and other brain areas, such as the insula cortex, as well as the subcortical striatal regions in patients with bvFTD compared with HC subjects. The findings of the present study remain largely unchanged in the entire brain jackknife sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSIONS: The present meta-analysis provides evidence of GM changes in the frontal-striatal-limbic brain areas in patients with bvFTD. Furthermore, GM atrophy in the fron-toinsular cortex and anterior cingulate cortex may be important anatomical changes for the diagnosis of patients with bvFTD.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1159/000338176

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pan, P. L., Song, W., Yang, J., Huang, R., Chen, K., Gong, Q. Y., Zhong, J. G., Shi, H. C., & Shang, H. F.
Affiliations
  • Sichuan University (CN)
  • Pediatrics and Genetics (US)
  • Yancheng Third People's Hospital (CN)
Venue
Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders
Publisher
S. Karger AG
Published
2012
Volume
33
Issue
2-3
Pages
141-148
ISSN
  • 1420-8008 (ISSN-L)
  • 1421-9824
OpenAlex
W2103270909
Cited by
90
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 2
FWCI
0.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
Keywords
behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia, gray matter atrophy, voxel-based morphometry, gray matter volume, frontal cortex, anterior cingulate cortex, insula, striatum, limbic system, brain atrophy
MeSH terms
Atrophy, Behavioral Symptoms, Brain Mapping, Frontal Lobe, Gyrus Cinguli, Humans, Neuroanatomy, Organ Size, Frontotemporal Dementia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review