Cited by 187

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Brain Growth of the Domestic Pig (Sus scrofa) from 2 to 24 Weeks of Age: A Longitudinal MRI Study

Conrad, Matthew S., Dilger, Ryan N., Johnson, Rodney W.·2012·Developmental Neuroscience

Abstract

An animal model with brain growth similar to humans, that can be used in MRI studies to investigate brain development, would be valuable. Our laboratory has developed and validated MRI methods for regional brain volume quantification in the neonatal piglet. The aim of this study was to utilize the MRI-based volume quantification technique in a longitudinal study to determine brain growth in domestic pigs from 2 to 24 weeks of age. MRI data were acquired from pigs 2–24 weeks of age using a 3-dimensional magnetization-prepared gradient echo sequence on a Magnetom Trio 3-tesla imager. Manual segmentation was performed for volume estimates of total brain, cortical, diencephalon, brainstem, cerebellar and hippocampal regions. Logistic modeling procedures were used to characterize brain growth. Total brain volume increased 130% (±12%) and 121% (±7%) from 2 to 24 weeks in males and females, respectively. The maximum increase in total brain volume occurred about the age of 4 weeks and 95% of whole brain growth occurred by the age of 21–23 weeks. Logistical modeling suggests there are sexually dimorphic effects on brain growth. For example, in females, the cortex was smaller (p = 0.04). Furthermore, the maximum growth of the hippocampus occurred about 5 weeks earlier in females than males, and the window for hippocampal growth was significantly shorter in females than males (p = 0.02, p = 0.002 respectively). These sexual dimorphisms are similar to what is seen in humans. In addition to providing important data on brain growth for pigs, this study shows pigs can be used to obtain longitudinal MRI data. The large increase in brain volume in the postnatal period is similar to that of human neonates and suggests pigs can be used to investigate brain development.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1159/000339311

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Under BEx-perfused conditions, neuroanatomical structure remained intact, comparable to in vivo brains.

    “Under BEx-perfused conditions, the neuroanatomical structure remained intact as demonstrated by normal ventricular size, preserved gray-white matter contrast, and delineation among anatomical landmarks (Fig. 3), which were comparable to in vivo brains23–25.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 31

  1. 10.2307%2F3454543 · DOI
  2. 10.1016%2FS0959-4388%2899%2900037-9 · DOI
  3. 10.1017%2FS0954579499002205 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1080%2F87565640802646767 · DOI
  5. 10.1093%2Fcercor%2F6.4.551 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1542%2Fpeds.111.5.939 · DOI
  7. 10.1161%2FCIRCHEARTFAILURE.108.814459 · DOI
  8. 10.1146%2Fannurev.nu.07.070187.002045 · DOI
  9. 10.1016%2Fj.neubiorev.2007.02.003 · DOI
  10. 10.1046%2Fj.1525-1373.2000.22314.x · DOI
  11. 10.1098%2Frspb.1967.0002 · DOI
  12. 10.1038%2Fpr.2011.21 · DOI
  13. 10.1016%2Fj.jneumeth.2010.07.041 · DOI
  14. 10.1016%2Fj.neuroimage.2005.01.005 · DOI
  15. 10.1080%2F02841850802334224 · DOI
  16. 10.1159%2F000088638 · DOI
  17. 10.1016%2Fj.bbi.2010.05.008 · DOI
  18. 10.1016%2FS0361-9230%2899%2900012-X · DOI
  19. 10.1203%2FPDR.0b013e3182110f7e · DOI
  20. 10.1001%2Farchpsyc.62.4.361 · DOI
  21. 10.1016%2Fj.neuroimage.2007.03.053 · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.1093%2Fcercor%2F11.6.490 · DOI
  23. 10.1002%2F%28SICI%291097-0029%2819980601%2941%3A5%3C441%3A%3AAID-JEMT10%3E3.0.CO%3B2-N · DOI
  24. 10.1242%2Fjeb.02141 · DOI
  25. 10.1016%2Fj.neuroimage.2009.08.016 · DOI
  26. 10.1111%2Fj.1528-1157.1999.tb00735.x · DOI
  27. 10.1002%2F%28SICI%291096-9861%2819960304%29366%3A2%3C223%3A%3AAID-CNE3%3E3.0.CO%3B2-7 · DOI
  28. 10.1002%2Fhipo.20492 · DOI
  29. 10.1006%2Fnimg.2001.0830 · DOI
  30. 10.1016%2FS0006-3223%2899%2900089-X · DOI
  31. 10.1016%2Fj.neuroimage.2009.07.066 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Conrad, M. S., Dilger, R. N., & Johnson, R. W.
Venue
Developmental Neuroscience
Publisher
S. Karger AG
Published
2012
Volume
34
Issue
4
Pages
291-298
ISSN
  • 0378-5866
  • 1421-9859
Cited by
187
References
5
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review