Cited by 361Traumatic Brain Injury ResearchTraumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular DisturbancesAutomotive and Human Injury Biomechanics

Prevalence of traumatic brain injury in the general adult population: a meta-analysis

Frost, R. Brock, Farrer, Thomas J., Primosch, Mark, Hedges, Dawson W.·2013·Neuroepidemiology

Abstract

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a significant public-health concern. To understand the extent of TBI, it is important to assess the prevalence of TBI in the general population. However, the prevalence of TBI in the general population can be difficult to measure because of differing definitions of TBI, differing TBI severity levels, and underreporting of sport-related TBI. Additionally, prevalence reports vary from study to study. In this present study, we used meta-analytic methods to estimate the prevalence of TBI in the adult general population. Across 15 studies, all originating from developed countries, which included 25,134 adults, 12% had a history of TBI. Men had more than twice the odds of having had a TBI than did women, suggesting that male gender is a risk factor for TBI. The adverse behavioral, cognitive and psychiatric effects associated with TBI coupled with the high prevalence of TBI identified in this study indicate that TBI is a considerable public and personal-health problem.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1159/000343275

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [11]11. Borenstein M, Hedges LV, Higgins JPT, Rothstein HR: Introduction to Meta-Analy- sis. Chichester, Wiley & Sons, 2009.
  2. [17]17. Van Reekum R, Cohen T, Wong J: Can trau- matic brain injury cause psychiatric disor- ders? J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci 2000; 12: 316-327.
  3. [24]24. Boswell JE, McErlean M, Verdile VP: Preva- lence of traumatic brain injury in an ED pop- ulation. Am J Emerg Med 2002; 20: 177-180.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Frost, R. B., Farrer, T. J., Primosch, M., & Hedges, D. W.
Affiliations
Brigham Young University (US)
Venue
Neuroepidemiology
Publisher
S. Karger AG
Published
2012-12-18
Volume
40
Issue
3
Pages
154-159
ISSN
  • 0251-5350 (ISSN-L)
  • 1423-0208
OpenAlex
W2005028667
Cited by
361
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 70 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 42 · 2021: 35 · 2020: 35 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 2
FWCI
0.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neuroepidemiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Traumatic Brain Injury Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Automotive and Human Injury Biomechanics
Keywords
traumatic brain injury, prevalence, adults, sex differences, male sex as risk factor, underreporting, TBI severity, public health burden
MeSH terms
Adult, Brain Injuries, Humans, Population Surveillance, Sex Factors, Prevalence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review