Cited by 77Pluripotent Stem Cells ResearchTissue Engineering and Regenerative MedicineMesenchymal stem cell research

Differentiation Patterns of Embryonic Stem Cells in Two- versus Three-Dimensional Culture

Open access
Pineda, Emma T., Nerem, Robert M., Ahsan, Tabassum·2013·Cells Tissues Organs

Abstract

Pluripotent stem cells are attractive candidates as a cell source for regenerative medicine and tissue engineering therapies. Current methods of differentiation result in low yields and impure populations of target phenotypes, with attempts for improved efficiency often comparing protocols that vary multiple parameters. This basic science study focused on a single variable to understand the effects of two-dimensional (2D) versus three-dimensional (3D) culture on directed differentiation. We compared mouse embryonic stem cells (ESCs) differentiated on collagen type I-coated surfaces (SLIDEs), embedded in collagen type I gels (GELs), and in suspension as embryoid bodies (EBs). For a systematic analysis in these studies, key parameters were kept identical to allow for direct comparison across culture configurations. We determined that all three configurations supported differentiation of ESCs and that the kinetics of differentiation differed greatly for cells cultured in 2D versus 3D. SLIDE cultures induced overall differentiation more quickly than 3D configurations, with earlier expression of cytoskeletal and extracellular matrix proteins. For 3D culture as GELs or EBs, cells clustered similarly, formed complex structures and promoted differentiation towards cardiovascular phenotypes. GEL culture, however, also allowed for contraction of the collagen matrix. For differentiation towards fibroblasts and smooth muscle cells which actively remodel their environment, GEL culture may be particularly beneficial. Overall, this study determined the effects of dimensionality on differentiation and helps in the rational design of protocols to generate phenotypes needed for tissue engineering and regenerative medicine.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1159/000346166

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In mouse embryonic stem cells, OCT4 levels decreased in both two-dimensional and three-dimensional cultures, indicating a loss of pluripotency, whereas NES and BRACHY-T markers increased.

    “Pineda et al.(91) demonstrated that OCT4 in mouse ESCs decreased in both 2D and 3D cultures, showing a loss of pluripotency, whereas NES (ectoderm) and BRACHY-T (mesoderm) markers were shown to increase.”

    From Modeling physiological events in 2D vs. 3D cell culture (2017) · cites this paper as [91]

    In Results, ‘Pluripotency and Germ Lineage Differentiation’ (page unavailable), OCT4 markedly decreased after four days in the 2D slide and 3D gel and embryoid-body cultures, indicating loss of pluripotency. The same section says NESTIN (NES) and BRACHY-T varied over time and were highest at day 4, rather than showing a general increase; ‘Functional Gene Groupings’ also reports that NES remained very low. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Free EBs had more dynamic changes in genotypic expression levels of cytoskeletal genes over 12-day span compared with GEL cultures.

    “Free EBs had more dynamic changes in the genotypic expression levels of cytoskeletal genes over the same 12-day span compared with the GEL cultures.”

    From Modeling physiological events in 2D vs. 3D cell culture (2017) · cites this paper as [91]

    The Results section (Matrix Remodeling; page unavailable) reports that intermediate-filament gene expression rose in both EB and GEL cultures from day 4 to days 8 and 12, with higher levels in EBs at day 12. It does not establish more dynamic changes across cytoskeletal genes generally: the measured microtubule gene was unaffected by time or culture condition. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • A key difference in morphology of GEL cultures was presence of elongated masses along edges of gel form.

    “A key difference in the morphology of GEL cultures was the presence of elongated masses along the edges of the gel form.”

    From Modeling physiological events in 2D vs. 3D cell culture (2017) · cites this paper as [91]

  • Pineda et al. found that GEL and unattached EB cultures produced similar cluster morphology, with defined boundaries and occasional cavities.

    “GEL and unattached EB cultures produced similar cluster morphology, with defined boundaries and the occasional cavities.”

    From Modeling physiological events in 2D vs. 3D cell culture (2017) · cites this paper as [91]

  • Mouse embryonic stem cells grown on collagen type I-coated glass slides in two-dimensional culture differentiated more rapidly than cells in three-dimensional cultures (embryoid bodies and GELs).

    “However, the ESCs cultured on glass slides (2D) coated with collagen type I had a faster rate of differentiation than in 3D cultures (EBs and GELs).”

    From Modeling physiological events in 2D vs. 3D cell culture (2017) · cites this paper as [91]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Elisseeff J McIntosh W Anseth K Riley S Ragan P Langer R 2000 Photoencapsulation of chondrocytes in poly(ethylene oxide)-based semi-interpenetrating networks J Biomed Mater Res 51 2 164 171 10825215

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pineda, E. T., Nerem, R. M., & Ahsan, T.
Affiliations
  • Tulane University (US)
  • Georgia Institute of Technology (US)
Venue
Cells Tissues Organs
Publisher
S. Karger AG
Published
2013
Volume
197
Issue
5
Pages
399-410
ISSN
  • 1422-6405 (ISSN-L)
  • 1422-6421
OpenAlex
W1987602592
Cited by
77
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 4
FWCI
2.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cells Tissues Organs (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Georgia Institute of Technology
  • Tulane University
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (P20GM103629)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Pluripotent Stem Cells Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Genetics › Mesenchymal stem cell research
Keywords
mouse embryonic stem cells, directed differentiation, monolayer culture, 3D cell culture, type I collagen, embryoid bodies, collagen gel, slides, cardiovascular differentiation, fibroblast differentiation, smooth muscle cells, extracellular matrix, collagen matrix contraction, cell clustering, tissue engineering
MeSH terms
Animals, Cell Differentiation, Collagen, Cytoskeleton, Extracellular Matrix, Gels, Gene Expression Regulation, Germ Cells, Biomarkers, Cluster Analysis, Cell Culture Techniques, Cell Lineage, Pluripotent Stem Cells, Cell Proliferation, Mice, Embryonic Stem Cells

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review