Cited by 49Muscle metabolism and nutritionMuscle Physiology and DisordersCardiovascular and exercise physiology

Dietary Protein for Muscle Hypertrophy

Tipton, Kevin D., Phillips, Stuart M.·2013·Nestlé Nutrition Institute Workshop Series

Abstract

Skeletal muscle hypertrophy is a beneficial adaptation for many individuals. The metabolic basis for muscle hypertrophy is the balance between the rates of muscle protein synthesis (MPS) and muscle protein breakdown (MPB), i.e. net muscle protein balance (NMPB = MPS - MPB). Resistance exercise potentiates the response of muscle to protein ingestion for up to 24 h following the exercise bout. Ingestion of many protein sources in temporal proximity (immediately before and at least within 24 h after) to resistance exercise increases MPS resulting in positive NMPB. Moreover, it seems that not all protein sources are equal in their capacity to stimulate MPS. Studies suggest that ∼20-25 g of a high-quality protein maximizes the response of MPS following resistance exercise, at least in young, resistance-trained males. However, more protein may be required to maximize the response of MPS with less than optimal protein sources and/or with older individuals. Ingestion of carbohydrate with protein does not seem to increase the response of MPS following exercise. The response of inactive muscle to protein ingestion is impaired. Ingestion of a high-quality protein within close temporal proximity of exercise is recommended to maximize the potential for muscle growth.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1159/000350259

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Protein supplementation (15-25 g over 4-14 weeks) augments lean mass accretion when combined with completion of a resistance training program.

    “Other reviews by Tipton, Phillips and Pasiakos, respectively, [36, 38, 39] provide further support that protein supplementation (15–25 g over 4–14 weeks) augments lean mass accretion when combined with completion of a resistance training program.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tipton, K. D., & Phillips, S. M.
Affiliations
University of Stirling (GB)
Venue
Nestlé Nutrition Institute Workshop Series
Publisher
S. Karger AG
Published
2013
Volume
76
Pages
73-84
ISSN
  • 1664-2147 (ISSN-L)
  • 1664-2155
OpenAlex
W1593299844
Cited by
49
References
9
Citations by year
2025: 6 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 7
FWCI
56.37
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nestlé Nutrition Institute Workshop series (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Muscle metabolism and nutrition
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Muscle Physiology and Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
Keywords
dietary protein, muscle hypertrophy, muscle protein synthesis, muscle protein degradation, resistance training, protein timing, protein quality, older adults
MeSH terms
Diet, Dietary Proteins, Humans, Hypertrophy, Muscle Proteins, Exercise, Muscle, Skeletal, Resistance Training

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review