Cited by 3,490Statistical Methods in EpidemiologyCardiac Imaging and DiagnosticsClinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills

Evaluating the Yield of Medical Tests

Harrell, Frank E.·1982·JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association

Abstract

A method is presented for evaluating the amount of information a medical test provides about individual patients. Emphasis is placed on the role of a test in the evaluation of patients with a chronic disease. In this context, the yield of a test is best interpreted by analyzing the prognostic information it furnishes. Information from the history, physical examination, and routine procedures should be used in assessing the yield of a new test. As an example, the method is applied to the use of the treadmill exercise test in evaluating the prognosis of patients with suspected coronary artery disease. The treadmill test is shown to provide surprisingly little prognostic information beyond that obtained from basic clinical measurements.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jama.1982.03320430047030

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • For binary outcome prediction models, the c-statistic is a reparameterization of Somer's D and can be derived from the distribution of the linear predictor, Cohen's effect size, or several correlation indices.

    “For instance, for prediction models with a binary outcome, the c-statistic is a reparameterization of Somer’s D,19 and can also be derived from the distribution of the linear predictor,20 Cohen’s effect size,20 or several correlation indices.21”
  • Harrell's version of the c-statistic appears most widespread and recommended for time-to-event outcomes.

    “Although validation studies do not commonly report the definition and estimation method of presented c-statistics, Harrell’s version21 appears to be most widespread and recommended.22”
  • Discrimination can be assessed across all time points using Harrell's c statistic.

    “Also, discrimination can be assessed across all time points using Harrell's c statistic.”

    From Developing clinical prediction models: a step-by-step guide (2024) · cites this paper as [83]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Harrell, F. E.
Corresponding author
Harrell, Frank E.
Venue
JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association
Published
1982-05-14
Volume
247
Issue
18
Pages
2543
ISSN
  • 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
  • 0098-7484
OpenAlex
W2084139018
Cited by
3,490
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 249 · 2025: 276 · 2024: 313 · 2023: 298 · 2022: 301 · 2021: 295 · 2020: 237 · 2019: 168 · 2018: 121 · 2017: 130 · 2016: 124 · 2015: 118 · 2014: 118 · 2013: 95 · 2012: 98
FWCI
4.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • JAMA (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Epidemiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
Keywords
prognostic value, treadmill exercise testing, coronary artery disease, clinical history and physical examination, diagnostic testing
MeSH terms
Catheterization, Diagnostic Services, Evaluation Studies as Topic, Exercise Test, Heart Diseases, Hospital Bed Capacity, 500 and over, Humans, Medical History Taking, North Carolina, Physical Examination

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review