Cited by 68Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchCancer-related cognitive impairment studiesAlzheimer's disease research and treatments

The Alzheimer's disease cooperative study prevention instrument project: longitudinal outcome of behavioral measures as predictors of cognitive decline

Open access
Banks, Sarah Jane, Raman, Rema, He, Feng, Salmon, David P., Ferris, Steven, Aisen, Paul, Cummings, Jeffrey·2014·Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders Extra

Abstract

BACKGROUND/METHODS: The Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study Prevention Instrument Project is a longitudinal study that recruited 644 cognitively healthy older subjects (aged between 75 and 93 years, 58% women) at baseline and evaluated their cognitive change over 4 years. The study was structured like a clinical trial to anticipate a prevention trial and to determine the performance of novel trial instruments in a longitudinal non-interventional trial framework. Behavioral symptoms were assessed at baseline. RESULTS: The existence of participant-reported behavioral symptoms at baseline predicted conversion to Clinical Dementia Rating scale score ≥0.5 over the 4-year period. CONCLUSIONS: The results imply that early anxiety and depression may be harbingers of future cognitive decline, and that patients exhibiting such symptoms, even in the absence of co-occurring cognitive symptoms, should be closely followed over time.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1159/000357775

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Banks, S. J., Raman, R., He, F., Salmon, D. P., Ferris, S., Aisen, P., & Cummings, J.
Affiliations
  • Cleveland Clinic (US)
  • University of California San Diego (US)
  • NYU Langone Health (US)
Corresponding author
Banks, Sarah Jane
Venue
Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders Extra
Publisher
S. Karger AG
Published
2014-12-18
Volume
4
Issue
3
Pages
509-516
ISSN
1664-5464 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2014743198
Cited by
68
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 1
FWCI
3.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders Extra (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
National Institute on Aging (P50AG005131, P30AG008051, U19AG010483)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Cancer-related cognitive impairment studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
Keywords
Alzheimer's disease, cognitive decline, behavioral symptoms, anxiety, depression, Clinical Dementia Rating, conversion to dementia, older adults, behavioral assessment instruments, dementia prevention, longitudinal outcomes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review