The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Environmental and Occupational Exposures and Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis in New England
Abstract
Background: Recent data provide support for the concept that potentially modifiable exposures are responsible for sporadic amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). Objective: To evaluate environmental and occupational exposures as risk factors for sporadic ALS. Methods: We performed a case-control study of ALS among residents of New England, USA. The analysis compared questionnaire responses from 295 patients with a confirmed ALS diagnosis to those of 225 controls without neurodegenerative illness. Results: Self-reported job- or hobby-related exposure to one or more chemicals, such as pesticides, solvents, or heavy metals, increased the risk of ALS (adjusted OR 2.51; 95% CI 1.64-3.89). Industries with a higher toxicant exposure potential (construction, manufacturing, mechanical, military, or painting) were associated with an elevated occupational risk (adjusted OR 3.95; 95% CI 2.04-8.30). We also identified increases in the risk of ALS associated with frequent participation in water sports, particularly waterskiing (adjusted OR 3.89; 95% CI 1.97-8.44). Occupation and waterskiing both retained independent statistical significance in a composite model containing age, gender, and smoking status. Conclusions: Our study contributes to a growing body of literature implicating occupational- and hobby-related toxicant exposures in ALS etiology. These epidemiologic study results also provide motivation for future evaluation of water-body-related risk factors.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Based on our prior work, we assessed the ALS risk associated with occupations that are likely to involve industrial chemical exposure. Specifically job titles involved in construction, manufacturing, mechanics, or painting were used as a surrogate for possible exposure. 9”
From Risk factors for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: A regional United States case‐control study (2021) · cites this paper as [9]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Association of ALS with head injury, cigarette smoking and APOE genotypes
Schmidt, S., Kwee, L. C., Allen, K. D., & Oddone, E. Z. (2010) · Journal of the Neurological Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.jns.2010.01.011 · Cited by 117
Trauma and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a case–control study from a population‐based registry
Pupillo, E., Messina, P., Logroscino, G., Zoccolella, S., Chiò, A., Calvo, A., Corbo, M., Lunetta, C., Micheli, A., Millul, A., et al. (2012) · European Journal of Neurology · doi:10.1111/j.1468-1331.2012.03723.x · Cited by 78
Research works printed but not linked: 28
- 10.1159/000351153 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/S1474-4422(14)70219-4 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.3109/17482960802430799 · DOI
- 10.1159/000355344 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/epirev/mxu001 · DOI
- 10.1097/EDE.0000000000000376 · DOI
- 10.1289/ehp.0900580 · DOI
- 10.1136/jnnp.2006.104414 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.envpol.2014.12.010 · DOI
- 10.1159/000443146 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.neuro.2009.07.010 · DOI
- 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009070 · DOI
- 10.3390/toxins2122837 · DOI
- 10.1001/archneurol.2012.254 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1289/ehp.0900566 · DOI
- 10.1097/00001648-200205000-00012 · DOI
- 10.1093/aje/kwq063 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1600-0404.1991.tb03970.x · DOI
- 10.4415/ANN_10_03_10 · DOI
- 10.1001/jamaneurol.2016.0594 · DOI
- 10.1136/oem.58.1.24 · DOI
- 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009070 · DOI
- 10.1289/ehp.0900580 · DOI
- 10.1093/aje/kwi343 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.mehy.2012.11.012 · DOI
- 10.1186/1476-069X-5-6 · DOI
- 10.1098/rspb.2015.2397 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/S1474-4422(14)70219-4 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The gut microbiome: a key player in the complexity of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS)
Boddy, S. L., Giovannelli, I., Sassani, M., Cooper-Knock, J., Snyder, M. P., Segal, E., Elinav, E., Barker, L. A., Shaw, P. J., & McDermott, C. J. (2021) · BMC Medicine · doi:10.1186/s12916-020-01885-3 · Cited by 127
Risk factors for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: A regional United States case‐control study
Andrew, A. S., Bradley, W. G., Peipert, D., Butt, T., Amoako, K., Pioro, E. P., Tandan, R., Novak, J., Quick, A., Pugar, K. D., et al. (2021) · Muscle & Nerve · doi:10.1002/mus.27085 · Cited by 54
Self-citationHong, D., Zhang, C., Wu, W., Lu, X., & Zhang, L. (2023) · Frontiers in Neurology · doi:10.3389/fneur.2023.1133546 · Cited by 38
Beaudin, M., Salachas, F., Pradat, P.-F., & Dupré, N. (2022) · Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis and Frontotemporal Degeneration · doi:10.1080/21678421.2022.2028167 · Cited by 12
Metadata
- Authors
- Andrew, A. S., Caller, T. A., Tandan, R., Duell, E. J., Henegan, P. L., Field, N. C., Bradley, W. G., & Stommel, E. W.
- Venue
- Neurodegenerative Diseases
- Publisher
- S. Karger AG
- Published
- 2017
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 2-3
- Pages
- 110-116
- ISSN
- 1660-2854
- 1660-2862
- PMC
- PMC5383428
- Cited by
- 79
- References
- 2
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review