Cited by 41Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis ResearchTraumatic Brain Injury ResearchSpinal Cord Injury Research

Head Injury and Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis: A Meta-Analysis

Liu, Guodong, Ou, Shan, Cui, Huijie, Li, Xuan, Yin, Zhiyong, Gu, Dongqing, Wang, Zhengguo·2021·Neuroepidemiology

Abstract

Background: Prior studies have suggested that head injury might be a potential risk factor of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). However, the association has not been well established. We aimed to provide a synopsis of the current understanding of head injury’s role in ALS. Methods: We performed a systematic search in PubMed for observational studies that quantitatively investigated the association between head injury and ALS risk published before April 10, 2020. We used a random-effects model to calculate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results: Fourteen eligible articles including 10,703 cases and 2,159,324 controls were selected in current meta-analysis. We found that head injury was associated with an increased risk of ALS (OR = 1.38, 95% CI: 1.20–1.60) and the association was slightly stronger concerning severe head injury and ALS risk (OR = 1.69, 95% CI: 1.27–2.23). Considering the number of head injuries (N) and ALS risk, the association was weak (OR = 1.23, 95% CI: 1.10–1.37, N = 1; OR = 1.29, 95% CI: 0.89–1.86, N ≥ 2). In addition, a strong association with ALS risk was found in individuals who suffered head injury <1 year (OR = 4.05, 95% CI: 2.79–5.89), and when the time lag was set at 1–5, 5–10, and >10 years, the pooled OR was 1.13, 1.35, and 1.10, respectively. Conclusion: This meta-analysis indicates that head injury, especially severe head injury, could increase ALS risk. Although a strong association is found between head injury <1 year and ALS risk in the current study, this result suggests a possibility of reverse causation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1159/000510987

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Liu, G., Ou, S., Cui, H., Li, X., Yin, Z., Gu, D., & Wang, Z.
Affiliations
Army Medical University (CN)
Venue
Neuroepidemiology
Publisher
S. Karger AG
Published
2021
Volume
55
Issue
1
Pages
11-19
ISSN
  • 0251-5350 (ISSN-L)
  • 1423-0208
OpenAlex
W3129726204
Cited by
41
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 3
FWCI
1.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neuroepidemiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Traumatic Brain Injury Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Spinal Cord Injury Research
Keywords
traumatic brain injury, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, ALS risk, severe traumatic brain injury, time delay, reverse causality, risk factors
MeSH terms
Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis, Craniocerebral Trauma, Humans, Risk Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review