Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 353

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Initial Experience With Remote Catheter Ablation Using a Novel Magnetic Navigation System: Magnetic Remote Catheter Ablation

Open access
Ernst, Sabine, Ouyang, Feifan, Linder, Christian, Hertting, Klaus, Stahl, Fabian, Chun, Julian, Hachiya, Hitoshi, Bänsch, Dietmar, Antz, Matthias, Kuck, Karl-Heinz·2004·Circulation

Abstract

Background— Catheters are typically stiff and incorporate a pull-wire mechanism to allow tip deflection. While standing at the patient’s side, the operator manually navigates the catheter in the heart using fluoroscopic guidance. Methods and Results— A total of 42 patients (32 female; mean age, 55±15 years) underwent ablation of common-type (slow/fast) or uncommon-type (slow/slow) atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) with the use of the magnetic navigation system Niobe (Stereotaxis, Inc). It consists of 2 computer-controlled permanent magnets located on opposite sides of the patient, which create a steerable external magnetic field (0.08 T). A small magnet embedded in the catheter tip causes the catheter to align and to be steered by the external magnetic field. A motor drive advances or retracts the catheter, enabling complete remote navigation. Radiofrequency current was applied with the use of a remote-controlled 4-mm, solid-tip, magnetic navigation–enabled catheter (55°C, maximum 40 W, 60 seconds) in all patients. The investigators, who were situated in the control room, performed the ablation using a mean of 7.2±4.7 radiofrequency current applications (mean fluoroscopy time, 8.9±6.2 minutes; procedure duration, 145±43 minutes). Slow pathway ablation was achieved in 15 patients, whereas slow pathway modulation was the end point in the remaining patients. There were no complications. Conclusions— The Niobe magnetic navigation system is a new platform technology allowing remote-controlled navigation of an ablation catheter. In conjunction with a motor drive unit, this system was used successfully to perform completely remote-controlled mapping and ablation in patients with AVNRT.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/01.cir.0000125126.83579.1b

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 7 references

Cited by

See all 353

Metadata

Authors
Ernst, S., Ouyang, F., Linder, C., Hertting, K., Stahl, F., Chun, J., Hachiya, H., Bänsch, D., Antz, M., & Kuck, K.-H.
Venue
Circulation
Published
2004-03-30
Volume
109
Issue
12
Pages
1472-1475
ISSN
  • 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4539
OpenAlex
W2079011887
Cited by
353
References
7
FWCI
14.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Initial Experience With Remote Catheter Ablation Using a Novel Magnetic Navigation System: Magnetic Remote Catheter Ablation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.cir.0000125126.83579.1b
The paper
Ernst, S., Ouyang, F., Linder, C., Hertting, K., Stahl, F., Chun, J., Hachiya, H., Bänsch, D., Antz, M., & Kuck, K.-H. (2004). Initial Experience With Remote Catheter Ablation Using a Novel Magnetic Navigation System: Magnetic Remote Catheter Ablation. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.0000125126.83579.1b

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.