Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 523

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Common Variant of the Endothelial Nitric Oxide Synthase (Glu298→Asp) Is a Major Risk Factor for Coronary Artery Disease in the UK

Hingorani, Aroon D., Liang, Chia Fan, Fatibene, Jenny, Lyon, Amelia, Monteith, Sue, Parsons, Ann, Haydock, Stephen, Hopper, Ruth V., Stephens, Nigel G., O’Shaughnessy, Kevin M., Brown, Morris J.·1999·Circulation

Abstract

Background—Endothelium-derived nitric oxide (NO) is synthesised from l-arginine by endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) encoded by the NOS 3 gene on chromosome 7. Because reduced NO synthesis has been implicated in the development of coronary atherosclerosis, which has a heritable component, we hypothesised that polymorphisms of NOS 3 might be associated with increased susceptibility to this disorder. Methods and Results—Single-strand conformation polymorphism analysis of NOS 3 identified a G→T polymorphism in exon 7 of the gene which encodes a Glu→Asp amino acid substitution at residue 298 of eNOS. We investigated the relationship between this Glu 298→Asp variant and atherosclerotic coronary artery disease (CAD) using 2 independent case-controlled studies. In the first study (CHAOS), cases consisted of 298 unrelated patients with positive coronary angiograms and controls were 138 unrelated healthy individuals ascertained through a population health screen. In the second study (CHAOS II), the cases were 249 patients with recent myocardial infarction (MI), and a further 183 unrelated controls. There was an excess of homozygotes for the Asp 298 variant among patients with angiographic CAD, and among patients with recent MI when compared with their respective controls (35.9% versus 10.2%,P<0.0001 in CHAOS, and 18.1% versus 8.7%,P<0.02 in CHAOS II). In comparison to Glu 298 homozygotes, homozygosity for Asp 298 was associated with an odds ratio of 4.2 (95% CI, 2.3 to 7.9) for angiographic CAD and 2.5 (95% CI, 1.3 to 4.2) for MI. Conclusions—Homozygosity for a common NOS 3 polymorphism (894 G→T) which encodes a Glu 298→Asp amino acid substitution in eNOS is a risk factor for angiographic CAD and recent MI in this population.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/01.cir.100.14.1515

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 523

Metadata

Authors
Hingorani, A. D., Liang, C. F., Fatibene, J., Lyon, A., Monteith, S., Parsons, A., Haydock, S., Hopper, R. V., Stephens, N. G., O’Shaughnessy, K. M., & Brown, M. J.
Venue
Circulation
Published
1999-10-05
Volume
100
Issue
14
Pages
1515-1520
ISSN
  • 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4539
OpenAlex
W2040901946
Cited by
523
References
3
FWCI
14.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Common Variant of the Endothelial Nitric Oxide Synthase (Glu298→Asp) Is a Major Risk Factor for Coronary Artery Disease in the UK. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.cir.100.14.1515
The paper
Hingorani, A. D., Liang, C. F., Fatibene, J., Lyon, A., Monteith, S., Parsons, A., Haydock, S., Hopper, R. V., Stephens, N. G., O’Shaughnessy, K. M., & Brown, M. J. (1999). A Common Variant of the Endothelial Nitric Oxide Synthase (Glu298→Asp) Is a Major Risk Factor for Coronary Artery Disease in the UK. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.100.14.1515

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.