Cited by 317Systemic Lupus Erythematosus ResearchLipoproteins and Cardiovascular HealthAcute Myocardial Infarction Research

Anti-cardiolipin antibodies and risk of myocardial infarction in a prospective cohort of middle-aged men.

Vaarala, Outi, Mänttäri, Matti, Manninen, Vesa, Tenkanen, Leena, Puurunen, Marja, Aho, Kimmo, Palosuo, Timo·1995·Circulation

Abstract

Background Data concerning the relation between antiphospholipid (aPL) antibodies and myocardial infarction in subjects without evidence of overt autoimmune disease are conflicting. All published studies have been performed on survivors of myocardial infarction or in patients with established coronary heart disease. The purpose of the present study was to determine whether the presence of aPL antibodies, namely, anti-cardiolipin (aCL) antibodies, carries a risk for myocardial infarction in a prospective cohort. Methods and results The sera to be studied were drawn at entry from middle-aged dyslipidemic men (non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, > or = 5.2 mmol/L) participating in the Helsinki Heart Study, a 5-year coronary primary prevention trial with gemfibrozil. Samples were tested for IgG-class antibodies to cardiolipin by an ELISA. The risk was estimated with logistic regression analysis using a nested case-control design with 133 patients (myocardial infarction or cardiac death) and 133 control subjects, matched for treatment (gemfibrozil/placebo) and geographical area. The aCL antibody level, as expressed in optical density units, was significantly higher in patients than in control subjects (0.417 versus 0.361; P Conclusions In a prospective cohort of healthy middle-aged men, the presence of a high aCL antibody level is an independent risk factor for myocardial infarction or cardiac death. Antibodies to cardiolipin and oxidized LDL may, at least in part, represent…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/01.cir.91.1.23

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vaarala, O., Mänttäri, M., Manninen, V., Tenkanen, L., Puurunen, M., Aho, K., & Palosuo, T.
Affiliations
  • University of Helsinki (FI)
  • From the National Public Health Institute (O.V., M.P., K.A., T.P.); and the First Department of Medicine (M.M., V.M., L.T.), University of Helsinki, Finland.
Venue
Circulation
Published
1995-01
Volume
91
Issue
1
Pages
23-27
ISSN
  • 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4539
OpenAlex
W2065122382
Cited by
317
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 12
FWCI
7.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Circulation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Acute Myocardial Infarction Research
Keywords
anticardiolipin antibodies, antiphospholipid antibodies, myocardial infarction, cardiovascular mortality, dyslipidemia, oxidized LDL antibodies, atherosclerotic cardiovascular risk, middle-aged men, gemfibrozil, cross-reactive antibodies, primary prevention
MeSH terms
Double-Blind Method, Humans, Lipoproteins, LDL, Male, Middle Aged, Myocardial Infarction, Prospective Studies, Risk Factors, Smoking, Triglycerides, Biomarkers, Case-Control Studies, Antibodies, Anticardiolipin

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review