Cited by 370Systemic Lupus Erythematosus ResearchSystemic Sclerosis and Related DiseasesVasculitis and related conditions

The epidemiology of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease among patients with SLE: A systematic review

Open access
Schoenfeld, Sara R., Kasturi, Shanthini, Costenbader, Karen H.·2013·Seminars in Arthritis and Rheumatism

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To perform a systematic review of the literature regarding the epidemiology of the association between systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (CVD), including the increased risk for CVD, as well as the risk factors responsible for development of CVD in patients with SLE. METHODS: We followed the PRISMA guidelines to systematically search the PubMed database from inception to June 2012. Studies were selected using predefined eligibility criteria, and 2 authors independently extracted data. The risk of bias was measured for each study using a domain-based assessment. RESULTS: We report on 28 studies that met criteria for inclusion in our analysis. We found strong epidemiologic evidence that SLE patients have an increased relative risk of CVD compared to controls. There is limited information regarding relative CVD mortality risks among SLE patients. Traditional CVD risk factors, including age, male sex, hyperlipidemia, smoking, hypertension, and CRP, are associated with CVD risk among SLE patients. Several SLE-specific factors, including disease activity and duration, and possibly specific manifestations and therapies, further increase risk. Several risk factors, such as disease activity and glucocorticoid use, are closely associated, making it difficult to disentangle their effects. CONCLUSIONS: CVD risk among SLE patients compared to the general population is at least doubled. While older SLE patients appear to have the highest absolute risks of CVD, young women have alarmingly high relative risks, given the rarity of CVD in the comparison general population. Both traditional and SLE-specific risk factors are important, although there are discrepancies within the literature.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2012.12.002

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schoenfeld, S. R., Kasturi, S., & Costenbader, K. H.
Affiliations
  • Massachusetts General Hospital (US)
  • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (US)
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
Venue
Seminars in Arthritis and Rheumatism
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-08
Volume
43
Issue
1
Pages
77-95
ISSN
0049-0172 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2149113739
Cited by
370
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 41 · 2021: 38 · 2020: 31 · 2019: 37 · 2018: 30 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 28 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 6
FWCI
3.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Seminars in Arthritis and Rheumatism (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Systemic Sclerosis and Related Diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Vasculitis and related conditions
Keywords
systemic lupus erythematosus, atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, cardiovascular risk factors, disease activity, glucocorticoid use, cardiovascular mortality, hyperlipidemia, smoking, hypertension, C-reactive protein, disease duration
MeSH terms
Adult, Cardiovascular Diseases, Female, Humans, Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic, Male, Risk, Comorbidity, Prevalence, Atherosclerosis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review