Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 451

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Increased Restenosis in Diabetes Mellitus After Coronary Interventions Is Due to Exaggerated Intimal Hyperplasia: A Serial Intravascular Ultrasound Study

Kornowski, Ran, Mintz, Gary S., Kent, Kenneth M., Pichard, Augusto D., Satler, Lowell F., Bucher, Theresa A., Hong, Mun K., Popma, Jeffrey J., Leon, Martin B.·1997·Circulation

Abstract

Background The increased risk of restenosis after catheter-based coronary interventions in diabetic patients has not been determined. Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) has shown that the decrease in arterial area is responsible for most of the late lumen loss in nonstented lesions and that intimal hyperplasia is responsible for all of the late lumen loss in stented lesions. Methods and Results Serial (postintervention and follow-up at 5.6±3.3 months) IVUS was used to study 251 native coronary lesions in 241 patients; 63 patients had treated diabetes mellitus (oral hypoglycemic drugs or insulin). Interventional procedures included percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty, directional or rotational atherectomy, excimer laser angioplasty, or Palmaz-Schatz stents. The external elastic membrane (EEM), stent, and lumen areas were measured. The plaque+media (P+M) area in nonstented lesions was calculated as EEM minus lumen area, and the intimal hyperplasia (IH) area in stented lesions was calculated as stent minus lumen area. The anatomic slice selected for serial analysis had an axial location within the target lesion at the smallest follow-up lumen area. Nonstented lesions in diabetics and nondiabetics had a similar decrease in EEM cross-sectional area (CSA; 1.9±2.8 versus 1.8±4.2 mm 2 ; P =.6350). However, nonstented lesions in diabetics had a greater increase in P=M CSA (1.3±2.8 versus 0.6±2.5 mm 2 , P =.0720), and the increase in P=M CSA contributed a greater percentage to the decrease in lumen CSA. In stented lesions, the decrease in lumen CSA (5.2±2.5 versus 2.0±2.3 mm 2 ) and the increase in IH CSA (5.0±2.8 versus 1.8±2.0 mm 2 ) were greater in diabetics than nondiabetics ( P =.0009 and P =.0007, respectively). These findings were even more striking in (nonstented and stented) restenotic lesions. Conclusions Serial IVUS analysis showed that the main reason for increased restenosis in diabetes mellitus was exaggerated intimal hyperplasia in both stented and nonstented lesions.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/01.cir.95.6.1366

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 14 references

Cited by

See all 451

Metadata

Authors
Kornowski, R., Mintz, G. S., Kent, K. M., Pichard, A. D., Satler, L. F., Bucher, T. A., Hong, M. K., Popma, J. J., & Leon, M. B.
Venue
Circulation
Published
1997-03-18
Volume
95
Issue
6
Pages
1366-1369
ISSN
  • 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4539
OpenAlex
W2072289636
Cited by
451
References
14
FWCI
27.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Increased Restenosis in Diabetes Mellitus After Coronary Interventions Is Due to Exaggerated Intimal Hyperplasia: A Serial Intravascular Ultrasound Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.cir.95.6.1366
The paper
Kornowski, R., Mintz, G. S., Kent, K. M., Pichard, A. D., Satler, L. F., Bucher, T. A., Hong, M. K., Popma, J. J., & Leon, M. B. (1997). Increased Restenosis in Diabetes Mellitus After Coronary Interventions Is Due to Exaggerated Intimal Hyperplasia: A Serial Intravascular Ultrasound Study. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.95.6.1366

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.