Cited by 128Blood Pressure and Hypertension StudiesHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic ControlCardiovascular and exercise physiology

Normotensive blacks have heightened sympathetic response to cold pressor test.

Calhoun, D A, Mutinga, M L, Collins, A S, Wyss, J M, Oparil, S·1993·Hypertension

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare sympathetic nerve activity responses to the cold pressor test in black and white normotensive subjects. We recorded muscle sympathetic nerve activity (microneurography of the peroneal nerve), arterial blood pressure, and heart rate in 9 normotensive American blacks (24 +/- 2 years, mean +/- SEM) and 10 normotensive American whites (28 +/- 2 years) at rest and during hand immersion in ice water (cold pressor test). Body weight was not different in the two groups (72.4 +/- 3.7 versus 74.1 +/- 3.8 kg, black versus white subjects). During supine rest, mean arterial pressure (92 +/- 2 versus 93 +/- 3 mm Hg, black versus white), heart rate (66 +/- 4 versus 62 +/- 3 beats per minute, black versus white), and muscle sympathetic nerve burst frequency (12 +/- 2 versus 17 +/- 3 bursts per minute, black versus white) were not different in the two groups. During the cold pressor test, mean arterial pressure, heart rate, and muscle sympathetic nerve activity increased from supine rest in both groups. The magnitudes of increases in mean arterial pressure and total minute muscle sympathetic nerve activity were significantly greater in blacks than whites (33.5 +/- 3 versus 22.4 +/- 3 mm Hg and 416 +/- 24% versus 243 +/- 31% of control, respectively, black versus white, P < .05). The increases in heart rate were most significantly different for the two groups. These data suggest that the enhanced pressor response to cold stress observed in normotensive blacks is attributable to greater increases in peripheral sympathetic nerve activity.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/01.hyp.22.6.801

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Calhoun, D. A., Mutinga, M. L., Collins, A. S., Wyss, J. M., & Oparil, S.
Affiliations
University of Alabama at Birmingham (US)
Venue
Hypertension
Published
1993-12
Volume
22
Issue
6
Pages
801-805
ISSN
  • 0194-911X (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4563
OpenAlex
W2168373801
Cited by
128
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 4
FWCI
1.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Hypertension (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • American Heart Association
  • National Institutes of Health (5k11hl002568-05)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (HL-07457+, HL 37722, HL02568, R01HL037722, T32HL007457)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
Keywords
cold pressor test, muscle sympathetic nerve activity, sympathetic nervous system, racial differences, African Americans, normotensive subjects, cold stress, blood pressure response, heart rate
MeSH terms
Adult, Analysis of Variance, Blood Pressure, Cold Temperature, Female, Heart Rate, Humans, Male, Muscles, Potassium, Sodium, Stress, Physiological, Sympathetic Nervous System, Supine Position, Black People, White People

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review