The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Evidence for hyperplasia in mesenteric resistance vessels of spontaneously hypertensive rats using a three-dimensional disector.
Open accessAbstract
Cellular dimensions in mesenteric resistance vessels from 10 spontaneously hypertensive rats and 10 Wistar-Kyoto rats have been determined using a random volume with an unbiased counting rule as the counting unit (the disector). With this method, vessels first were mounted on a myograph. Media thickness (spontaneously hypertensive rats, 11.3 micron; Wistar-Kyoto rats, 8.6 micron; P less than 0.01), lumen diameter (spontaneously hypertensive rats, 178 micron; Wistar-Kyoto rats, 194 micron; P greater than 0.1), and maximum active wall tension response (spontaneously hypertensive rats, 3.2 N/m; Wistar-Kyoto rats, 2.5 N/m; P less than 0.05) were determined. After fixation, serial sections normal to the long axis of the smooth muscle cells were made. In each vessel, the disector was a defined volume of the vessel wall (volume ca. 25 X 10(3) micron3) which was contained in about eight of these sections. The number of nuclei within the disector was counted using an unbiased, three-dimensional counting rule. On the basis that cells were mononuclear (an assumption that was tested), the ratio of this number divided by disector volume equaled the numerical cellular density. Measurement of the fraction of media taken up by smooth muscle cells then gave mean cell volume (spontaneously hypertensive rats, 563 micron3; Wistar-Kyoto rats, 615 micron3; P greater than 0.1). From the myograph measurements, the number of cells per unit length (spontaneously hypertensive rats, 10.4/micron; Wistar-Kyoto rats, 7.4/micron; P less than 0.05) and maximum force production per cell (spontaneously hypertensive rats, 5.1 microN; Wistar-Kyoto rats, 5.7 microN; P greater than 0.1) could then be calculated.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Wall stress and patterns of hypertrophy in the human left ventricle.
Grossman, W., Jones, D., & McLaurin, L. P. (1975) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci108079 · Cited by 2,403
Physiological aspects of primary hypertension.
Folkow, B. (1982) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.1982.62.2.347 · Cited by 1,768 · cited 2×
“(Circ Res 57: 794- 800, 1985) IT is now well established that structural changes in the vasculature are associated with hypertension (Folkow, 1982).”
Background
Cited by
Vascular Remodeling in Hypertension: Roles of Apoptosis, Inflammation, and Fibrosis
Intengan, H. D., & Schiffrin, E. L. (2001) · Hypertension · doi:10.1161/hy09t1.096249 · Cited by 979
Naftilan, A. J., Pratt, R. E., & Dzau, V. J. (1989) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci114032 · Cited by 623
Intengan, H. D., & Schiffrin, E. L. (2000) · Hypertension · doi:10.1161/01.hyp.36.3.312 · Cited by 459
Inhibiting the Effects of Angiotensin on Cardiovascular Hypertrophy
Metsärinne, K. P., Stoll, M., Falkenhahn, M., Gohlke, P., & Unger, T. (1994) · Angiotensin Receptors · doi:10.1007/978-1-4615-2464-9_13 · Cited by 6
Metadata
- Authors
- Mulvany, M. J., Baandrup, U., & Gundersen, H. J.
- Venue
- Circulation Research
- Published
- 1985-11
- Volume
- 57
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 794-800
- ISSN
- 0009-7330 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4571
- OpenAlex
- W2021450103
- Cited by
- 188
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 4.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evidence for hyperplasia in mesenteric resistance vessels of spontaneously hypertensive rats using a three-dimensional disector. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.res.57.5.794
- The paper
- Mulvany, M. J., Baandrup, U., & Gundersen, H. J. (1985). Evidence for hyperplasia in mesenteric resistance vessels of spontaneously hypertensive rats using a three-dimensional disector. Circulation Research. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.res.57.5.794
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
