Cited by 638Acute Ischemic Stroke ManagementCircadian rhythm and melatoninBlood Pressure and Hypertension Studies

Circadian Variation in the Timing of Stroke Onset: A Meta-analysis

Elliott, William J.·1998·Stroke

Abstract

Background and Purpose —Acute myocardial infarction and sudden death display a circadian rhythm, with a higher risk between 6 am and noon. Some reports suggest that stroke does not follow such a circadian variation and that hemorrhagic stroke occurs more often during the evening. Methods —A meta-analysis of 31 publications reporting the circadian timing of 11 816 strokes was performed, subdividing (when possible) by the type of stroke, according to the time of onset of symptoms. When precise timing was not given, strokes were distributed evenly (that is, biasing toward the null hypothesis of lack of circadian variation). Results —All subtypes of strokes displayed a significant ( P <0.001) circadian variation in time of onset, whether divided into 3-, 4-, or 6-hour time periods. There was a 49% increase (95% confidence interval, 44% to 55%) in stroke of all types between 6 am and noon (compared with expectations if no circadian variation was present), which is a 79% (95% confidence interval, 72% to 87%) increase over the normalized risk of the other 18 hours of the day. There were 29% fewer strokes between midnight and 6 am , a 35% decrease compared with the other 18 hours of the day. All three subtypes of stroke had a significantly higher risk between 6 am and noon (55% for 8250 ischemic strokes; 34% for 1801 hemorrhagic strokes, and 50% for 405 transient ischemic attacks). Conclusions —These data support the presence of a circadian pattern in the onset of stroke, with a significantly higher risk in the morning.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/01.str.29.5.992

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Epidemiological data reveal a robust morning increase in adverse cardiovascular events, including stroke, myocardial infarction, serious ventricular arrhythmias, and sudden cardiac death.

    “Moreover, epidemiological data reveal a robust morning increase in adverse CV events, including stroke (7,8), myocardial infarction (9)(10)(11), serious ventricular arrhythmias (12), and sudden cardiac death (refs.11, 13, and Figure 1).”

    From Role of the circadian system in cardiovascular disease (2018) · cites this paper as [7]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Elliott, W. J.
Affiliations
Rush University Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Elliott, William J.
Venue
Stroke
Published
1998-05
Volume
29
Issue
5
Pages
992-996
ISSN
  • 0039-2499 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4628
OpenAlex
W2110792462
Cited by
638
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 27 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 36 · 2023: 38 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 35 · 2016: 32 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 34 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 26
FWCI
7.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Stroke (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Circadian rhythm and melatonin
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
Keywords
circadian rhythm, stroke onset, ischemic stroke, hemorrhagic stroke, transient ischemic attack, time of day, morning surge, circadian variation
MeSH terms
Cerebral Hemorrhage, Cerebrovascular Disorders, Circadian Rhythm, Humans, Time Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review