Cited by 485Atrial Fibrillation Management and OutcomesHealth Education and ValidationCardiac Health and Mental Health

Development and validation of the Atrial Fibrillation Effect on QualiTy-of-Life (AFEQT) Questionnaire in patients with atrial fibrillation

Spertus, John, Dorian, Paul, Bubien, Rosemary, Lewis, Steve, Godejohn, Donna, Reynolds, Matthew R., Lakkireddy, Dhanunjaya R., Wimmer, Alan P. +2 more·2011·Circulation Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AF) has a deleterious impact on health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL), but measuring this outcome is difficult. A comprehensive, validated, disease-specific questionnaire to measure the spectrum of QoL domains affected by AF and its treatment is not available. We developed and validated a 20-item questionnaire, Atrial Fibrillation Effect on QualiTy-of-life (AFEQT), in a 6-center, prospective, observational study. METHODS AND RESULTS: Factor analyses established 4 conceptual domains (Symptoms, Daily Activities, Treatment Concern, and Treatment Satisfaction) from which individual domain and global scores were calculated. Participants from 6 centers completed the AFEQT at baseline, at month 1, and at month 3. Psychometric analyses included internal consistency and known-group validity. Test-retest reliability was assessed by comparing 1-month changes in scores among those with no change in therapy. Effect size was used to assess responsiveness after intervention. Among 219 patients age 62±11.9 years, 94% completed the AFEQT at baseline and 3 months; 66% had paroxysmal, 24% persistent, 5% longstanding persistent, and 5% permanent AF. Internal consistency was >0.88 for all scales. Lower AFEQT scores were observed with increased AF severity, categorized as asymptomatic, mild, moderate and severe, respectively: 71.2±20.6, 71.3±19.2, 57.9±19.0, and 42.0±21.2. Intraclass correlations for Overall, Symptoms, Daily Activities, Treatment Concern, and Satisfaction scores were 0.8, 0.5, 0.8, 0.7, and 0.7, respectively. Changes in 3-month scores were larger after ablation than with pharmacological adjustments, and both were greater than those observed in stable patients. CONCLUSIONS: This initial validation of AFEQT supports its use as an outcome in studies and a means to clinically follow patients with AF.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/circep.110.958033

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Spertus, J., Dorian, P., Bubien, R., Lewis, S., Godejohn, D., Reynolds, M. R., Lakkireddy, D. R., Wimmer, A. P., Bhandari, A., & Burk, C.
Affiliations
St. Michael's Hospital (CA)
Venue
Circulation Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology
Published
2011-02
Volume
4
Issue
1
Pages
15-25
ISSN
  • 1941-3084 (ISSN-L)
  • 1941-3149
OpenAlex
W2111786081
Cited by
485
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 35 · 2025: 48 · 2024: 60 · 2023: 42 · 2022: 46 · 2021: 49 · 2020: 36 · 2019: 38 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 28 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 17
FWCI
7.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Circulation Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Education › Health Education and Validation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Health and Mental Health
Keywords
atrial fibrillation, health-related quality of life, patient-reported outcomes, questionnaire development, psychometric validation, catheter ablation, anticoagulation, treatment satisfaction, known-groups validity, test-retest reliability
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Atrial Fibrillation, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Psychometrics, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Retrospective Studies, Sensitivity and Specificity, Reproducibility of Results, Outcome Assessment, Health Care

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review